Wednesday, 2020-10-14

T42<stone %lastname%>
T42<stone %lastname%> an issue, need anyone to help me.04:10
T42<stone %lastname%> an issue, need help04:11
piggzMister_Magister: on 3.4 they changed it so first has to be pin code07:18
*** spiiroin_ is now known as spiiroin07:37
PeperJohnnypiggz: it seems that I'm booting from the wrong dtb enoughthough it is not lying in /boot/  "NOTICE:  BL31: Found U-Boot DTB at 0x4065bc8, model: Pine64 PinePhone Braveheart (1.1)"08:09
PeperJohnnymy arch image which is on emmc identifies it correctly as a pinetab08:10
piggzPeperJohnny: have a look at the boot script we use ... there is some debug printing for what it gets from uboot, or, you could change the script to force the right one08:15
PeperJohnnyyeah the scr says "load mmc 0:1 ${fdt_addr_r} /sun50i-a64-pinetab.dtb" which is lying in boot root08:17
PeperJohnnypiggz: ^08:17
piggzcan you pastebin the script and uart output?08:21
T42<ItsMeShouko> Do we need new hadk for porting 3.4 or 3.3 is fine?08:24
PeperJohnnypiggz: I deleted all pinephone dtbs I could find, but it's still getting it from somewhere08:26
piggzPeperJohnny: are you recompiling the boot.scr, not just editing the source?08:31
PeperJohnnypiggz: haven't touched the boot.scr at all. It's still the one from the the only thing I changed were the Image and dtbs I compiled myself08:34
piggzi think the default one we use assumes it gets the dtb name from uboot, and if not, defaults to the pinephone-1.1 one08:36
PeperJohnnyI redid the scr with what was in the wiki, but still no dice08:40
PeperJohnnyIt seems I may have borked up my built kernel. I'll be back in a compiled kernel ;)08:46
PeperJohnnynope didn't work and I'm all out of ideas for now. I'll take a break and maybe tackle it later on09:51
T42<elros34> stone down: if you are building on 3.3.0.x target then you need to run: 'sb2 -t $VENDOR-$DEVICE-$PORT_ARCH -m sdk-install -R chmod 777 /boot' once to fix that /boot permission issue10:26
T42<adampigg> The sign of a polished port :D11:49
T42<adampigg> (Photo, 1920x2560)
T42<peperjohnny %lastname%> Nice!12:44
rinigus@adampigg: and I thought that in quality port  you don't need to reboot that frequently. .. :) Very nice!12:47
T42<adampigg> rinigus: well yes ... there is still the 2 day reboot!12:47
T42P_U_N_I_S_H_E_R_47 was added by: P_U_N_I_S_H_E_R_4717:40
T42<P_U_N_I_S_H_E_R_47> Hello17:40
T42<P_U_N_I_S_H_E_R_47> Is sailfish os available for zuk z2 plus? If yes pls send link17:41
PeperJohnnypiggz: I checked and the builds already with the pinetab booting the wrong image.19:26
PeperJohnnyI'll see if I can rebuild the uboot stuff19:27
PeperJohnnymanaged to boot manually, but no display. But after todays garbled mess, who knows if the kernel is really patched. I'll start with a blank slate tomorrow19:52
xmnquestion do you guys need libhybris for pinephone port? I didn't think so but not sure.20:04
PeperJohnnyyou don't need it since there's no android stuff in pinephone20:04
xmnyeah, that what I was thinking. thx. some twitter poster made me think if I was wrong, but they seemed to be bias towards purism :)20:05
xmnI don't understand fud and misinformation if done on purpose. I can understand uninformed. Which I am on many things :P.20:07
PeperJohnnywonder what the guy is on.20:07
xmnpurism meth lol20:07
xmndon't get me wrong I like what purism is doing20:07
PeperJohnnyit is good, I see a lot of people with phosh stuff on pinetab, so more power to them20:08
xmnbut it should never be just one company that helps bring open linux OS to a more success eco system and market.20:08
PeperJohnnyah well that's the crux20:08
PeperJohnnyideally it wouldn't be that way, but since some devs get paid we take what we can get I guess20:09
PeperJohnnybecause doing an mobile OS is hard20:09
xmnyeah I find it funny how ppl put down purism (which they sometime deserve), while loading software and UI/UX stuff they worked on and spent money to bring to market.20:10
xmnyeah fro sure mobile OS are hard20:10
PeperJohnnythere is some valid criticism, but they're providing a lot of people with a nice OS and that's an ok in my book :D20:11
xmnyup, for sure20:11
xmnalthough I would say we had many OS, but the mind frame for users have change to require specific apps. And though apps mainly exist on 2 platforms now :(20:11
PeperJohnnythere are efforts to bring anbox to phosh20:14
xmnyeah I saw that pretty cool20:14
xmnThough I would be worry about the android apps leaking info.20:15
xmnAnd Also I think support android make the linux OS some what dependent on them, which could prevent dev of native apps.20:16
xmnBut of course there are some apps that companies wont allow open/ none in house dev of so I guess it needed to give ppl the option to move to fully linux base phone.20:17
PeperJohnnythere's a dicussion about this on if you want to chime in ;)20:17
xmnheh, sorry I'm chatty one today.20:18
PeperJohnnywas nice talking to you, but I have to leave. Good night or whatever timezone you're in20:18
PeperJohnnynah no worry about that, I am just outta time for today20:18
xmnBut I'm not signed up on that forum. I'm on the one20:19
xmncool, have a great one!!20:19
T42Bard %lastname% was added by: Bard %lastname%20:19
T42Alexander %lastname% was added by: Alexander %lastname%22:30

Generated by 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!