Saturday, 2024-05-25

T42_<elros34> @b100dian looks like submodule sparse is empty and files are not copied thus build fails, maybe because of updated rpm or something related in sfos 4.6.x13:12
malsomething odd is happening13:29
T42_<elros34> maybe _obs_build_project is false13:32
mal@elros34 that indeed fixed it13:40
T42_<elros34> where it is defined? I have no clue where to search for it13:41
malit's in project config, I added it to the global 4.6 project config now, testing again13:42
T42_<b100dian> You folks rock, I just re-triggered services and all went well apparently13:44
malworks fine now13:44
mal@elros34 thanks for figuring that out13:44
T42_<b100dian> +113:45
T42_<b100dian> now, between "have choice for profiled-settings needed by profiled: `profiled-settings-default` `sailfish-content-profiled-settings-default`" which one should I add to Prefers?13:46
T42_<elros34> maybe still missing some macros13:47
T42_<elros34> both packages are mentioned in 4.5
maljust a moment13:48
T42_<elros34> but not on 4.613:48
malfixing things13:48
malnow those build13:49
malthere was a bit too much project config cleanup done for 4.6 when adding it to community obs so some things got lost13:50
T42_<b100dian> Cleanup is good13:52
T42_<elros34> mal: do change latest to 4.6 in EA stage or only after full release is out? Currently it's prbably 4.5 that is why @b100dian had this issue only in testing build13:56
mallatest will change to 4.6 only after full release is done13:58
malthat is how it has always been13:58
T42_<b100dian> so I've jumped in too "Early". But it is good to know, a testing EA release should be possible14:00
malthe main reason for the ea target on obs was to get chum build so there would be fewer update issue hopefully14:02
T42_<b100dian> I know, that's why I jumped to the conclusion I can update the port too14:05
T42_<adampigg> If anyone is doing any native port work, ive set up an org/project for managing all the projects, feel free to get involved
T42_<abranson> the face on that14:45
T42_<b100dian> both this and sailfishos-open need logos. A sailfish and a pinguin, a sailfish and a gnu head...14:55
T42_<b100dian> mal: next up is mic complaining that does not exist. Should the new RELEASE export be only 4.6?14:57
malI haven't added that repo yet14:58
malusually development testing is supposed to happen in devel project not testing :)14:59
T42_<b100dian> haha ok14:59
malwe haven't actually though yet how to handle the community-adaptation package for 4.615:00
malI added that target now, but still usually we don't add ea targets to testing15:02
T42_<b100dian> no worries, I;ll keep an eye on what's announced when the time comes.15:02
T42_<b100dian> That's very kind. Let's hope there are no multiple EA releases15:03
T42_<adampigg> i forked one of your repos into there :) (re @abranson: the face on that)15:26
T42_<adampigg> mal: hows new kernel-headers?15:26
mal@adampigg it's in obs already15:30
T42_<adampigg> mal: looks like 3.18 .. need newer for ell/ofono
malit's not tagged15:32
malit's really 5.4.27615:32
malmaybe we should have that in that native project so we can tag it15:32
T42_<adampigg> feel free15:45
T42_<adampigg> mal: gst plugins with v4l need re-done to point to new monorepo16:07
mal@adampigg simple rebase worked conflicts, triggered build now16:15
mal*without conflicts16:16
T42_<b100dian> So, the reason I tried to re-make the image for tucana is because the devicelock does not work in testing. I have backtracked this to an error like "encpartition[1562]: Device /dev/sailfish/home does not exist or access denied"19:28
T42_<b100dian> and comparing to the devel build and the sake build(s), there is "pluginName=/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/devicelock/encpartition" inside /usr/share/lipstick/devicelock/devicelock.conf (whereas otherwise it's encsfa[-fpd]19:29
T42_<b100dian> I discovered that some years ago I commented out Requires: jolla-devicelock-daemon-encsfa from adaptation in tucana19:30
T42_<b100dian> Without a proper comment, something like "fixing boot"19:30
T42_<b100dian> However, if I put it back I cannot install the adaptation package, "The following package update will NOT be installed"19:32
T42_<b100dian> And even mic complains: requires 'patterns-sailfish-device-adaptation-tucana', but this requirement cannot be provided19:33
T42_<b100dian> Build link
T42_<b100dian> I do not understand how this works for sake, how this presumably works on devel for tucana (it has encsfa-fpd binary plugin).19:35
T42_<b100dian> Anyone rpm-experienced what to query?19:35
T42_<b100dian> Hmm maybe rinigus explains in this commit, it should be commented out if you're using fpd, let me check
malyes, jolla-devicelock-daemon-encsfa is used when there is no fingerpring support20:29
T42_<b100dian> Yes, the mic build worked after something similar20:39
T42_<b100dian> It was a tad more complicated to update, but I assume a version —dup will not pose the same questions20:40
T42_<b100dian> The only problem now is that it offers to set up fingerprint sensor at initial setup20:40
T42_<b100dian> and that doesn't work for under display. Too bad the new community phone doesn't have one, there would have been light circles in there, wherever dconf says ;)20:41
mal@b100dian about display cutouts, add file /dconf/db/vendor.d/silica-cutouts.txt with content22:05
malcutouts = [[x, y, w, h]]22:05
maladd suitable numbers to that last line22:06
T42_<b100dian> wow, dconf update and magic happens. Thank you!22:17
T42_<b100dian> That is an interesting design around cutouts22:17
malthe whole idea of cutouts on devices is so stupid :)22:20
malonly makes things complicated with no real benefits22:21
malsame with the recent trend of not adding notification led on devices22:22
T42_<b100dian> I know:(22:23
malsame with rounded corners in viewable display area22:23
T42_<b100dian> yeah, let's cram that top bar even more, we don't need them pixels22:24
T42_<b100dian> there are already notched laptops22:25
malif they would just have small amount of non-display area at the top and bottom then camera, led and other stuff would fix just fine, and device would still look fine22:25
malreally? even on laptops? that's even more stupid22:25
T42_<b100dian> wondering when they'll get rounded corners :))22:25
T42_<b100dian> There are even under-display cameras today, if you really want to show off your thin bezels.22:27
T42_<b100dian> You don't have to leave with a whole in the display the whole time, only when "needed".22:27
malyeah. but why are thin bezels so important for some people? never understood that, like a phone is a phone, quite irrelevant how it looks :)22:28
T42_<b100dian> It's akin to people wanting small cars, but spacious22:42

Generated by 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!