| T42 | <edp_17> I'll do. | 06:22 |
|---|---|---|
| T42 | <edp_17> mal: I got: "unable to walk on path 'sailfishos:5.0:hw-common/latest_arm7hl' " | 06:37 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Here is my Meta config: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/qBhRMr6Vj4/ | 06:38 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Ok, I've deleted the "hw-common" lines and it works now. I guess that is specific for fp5, so, I don't need. | 06:43 |
| T42 | <elros34> armv7hl instead arm7hl | 06:48 |
| T42 | <edp_17> No, I didn't need that hw-common because I think that is FP5 specific. | 07:43 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Now, all of them built on OBS and the error gone on device. Many thanks again for helping sorting it out. | 07:43 |
| Mister_Magister | mal: ayy I finally got my CR :D | 08:06 |
| T42 | <elros34> @edp_17 it's not. AFAIK it's "mirror" for jolla's adaptation-common in case some of your packages requires some dependencies from adaptation-common | 12:40 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Okay, I've added it back. | 12:48 |
| mal | Mister_Magister: yes, seems like the reason why I hadn't approved it (not being sure if that hbm_and_level == 100 change was correct) was correct, I just hadn't had time to investigate why it felt wrong | 12:55 |
| mal | @edp_17 what is fp5 specific? | 13:02 |
| mal | @edp_17 that hw-common is probably not really relevant for very old devices, it just has some packages prebuilt like for newer devices various binder plugins which on older devices are not used | 13:04 |
| T42 | <edp_17> mal: I though that "sailfishos:5.0:hw-common" was fp5 specific. | 13:14 |
| T42 | <edp_17> mal: What do you consider as "very old device"? | 13:15 |
| mal | I think older than android 8 base | 13:18 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Right, so I need that if I use lineageos 17.1 base. Thanks. | 13:38 |
| mal | not aways | 13:43 |
| mal | it depends on whether your device has the binder services for sensors, gps etc | 13:43 |
| mal | or if it uses the older hal way | 13:43 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Ok, I leave it there for now because I'll ask here anyway if something doesn't work. :) | 16:01 |
| T42 | <A_T_R> #offtopic ? why most of PRs about fixup-mountpoint are not merged ? | 16:10 |
| T42 | <A_T_R> https://github.com/mer-hybris/hybris-boot/pull/202 | 16:10 |
| T42 | <NotKit> honestly I wonder why it still exists in the first place, all recent devices should be fine to just always use the partlabels | 16:20 |
| mal | systemd doesn't really like the partlabels as device in mount services | 16:34 |
| mal | not sure why it's like that | 16:34 |
| mal | the mounts don't work unless we use device nodes | 16:35 |
| T42 | <NotKit> last time I tried, it could handle /dev/disk/by-partlabel/name, unless something has changed | 16:46 |
| mal | ah, I think I confused it to by-name paths | 16:47 |
| T42 | <NotKit> by-name is correct, sorry, I confused it myself | 16:47 |
| T42 | <NotKit> ueventd has by-partlabel instead | 16:48 |
| mal | ok, maybe we could see if replacing by-name with by-partlabel would work | 16:48 |
| mal | automatically | 16:48 |
| mal | so replacing fixup with a different way | 16:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!