| Mister_Magister | with that every supported device will be covered | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| Mister_Magister | (except for the fairphones) | 00:00 |
| Mister_Magister | no need to rebuild dcd, the file is pulled from github not from rpm (it doesn't even land in rpm) | 00:07 |
| Mister_Magister | @adampigg, from the supported ports (5.0 onwards), I've got 7/29 ports and you got 8/29 (you beat me you sly bastard), rest of the people have counts under 5 :P | 00:17 |
| Mister_Magister | "this is not a competition" yes it is :D | 00:28 |
| Mister_Magister | both of us combined is a majority (over 50%) :D | 00:30 |
| Mister_Magister | that's kinda awesome | 00:30 |
| Mister_Magister | @adampigg but if yggdrasilx uses yggdrasil dcd that means then name of the device in system settings will be Volla Phone not Volla Phone X? | 00:43 |
| *** n2klb_ is now known as n2klb | 01:47 | |
| Mister_Magister | mal: @adampigg: Since I'm gonna be making mainline port for op6 too I'm thining of making sorta "HADK" for mainline and wanted to coordinate it with yall. Currently there's no standardised way of doing it, like on hybris we have dhd, dcd, dhv. we can use scripts in dhd to build packages locally and run mic, that stuff is lacking in mainline because we don't have dhd. How about we add submodule to kernel_adaptation (tbh we already | 02:11 |
| Mister_Magister | have kernel_adaptation_simplified) with build_packages adapted for mainline? that'd build kernel_adaptation instead of dhd? Also nothing adds native-common repo we have to put it in dcd per device, could we make dcd add it to .ks file when native_build is on? I want to make my x2 port defacto template for mainline port and standardise everything | 02:11 |
| T42 | <adampigg> mister_magister: Pine devices are defacto. Only missing part is probably nicer handling of native-common repo. we should do that the same as in my halium builds, a fork of community-adaption repo which adds that in | 07:28 |
| Mister_Magister | pine is different though dontcha think? it's not qcom and they don't use submodule and they don't build kernel image they don't do a lot of stuff @adampigg | 07:45 |
| Mister_Magister | when i was looking at pinephone repos they made 0 sense, it does not build nothing makes sense in them | 07:47 |
| T42 | <edp_17> @Mister_Magister , Yes, I do have some other ports too. I'll update them one by one then they all will get that info. | 10:44 |
| Mister_Magister | @edp_17 thanks! | 10:44 |
| *** n2klb_ is now known as n2klb | 10:58 | |
| T42 | <edp_17> I have a few projects to delete on OBS. In some, there are builds for multiple sailfishos versions. If I delete the project, will it delete all those download repos too? | 11:11 |
| T42 | <edp_17> Yes, it did. :) | 11:13 |
| Mister_Magister | mal: funfact my tiny lil VerdandiTeam group will soon have 11 actively supported ports, same as jolla (without counting jp26). I just thought that's kinda awesome :D | 12:20 |
| Mister_Magister | And we have tablet, and soon maybe feature phone too xd | 12:20 |
| Mister_Magister | all for the glory of sailfishos | 12:21 |
| Mister_Magister | thought you might find that interesting :P | 12:23 |
| Mister_Magister | oh also mal quick question uhh in the second startup wizard if you log into jolla account you can pick some jolla apps. Now we want to make same thing but for my bloat and to the best of your knowledge do you think it will be easier to modify second startup wizard or add third startup wizard after second one? | 12:26 |
| sharks[m] | I tried patching second startup wizard but its a bit fragile. Check test branch of my droid-configs-pdx225, incomplete WIP but the concept is there. Trouble is the jolla app selector will be holding a lock on the package manager until it finishes? I was going to come back to it another day when I'd had a bit more of a think about a better way to do it | 12:30 |
| Mister_Magister | this is me thinking about a better way of doing it: ask jolla employee who has the sources xd | 12:31 |
| sharks[m] | Fair, jolla-startupwizard is proprietary unfortunately but maybe we can get some hints | 12:32 |
| Mister_Magister | I'm not against third startup wizard | 12:33 |
| sharks[m] | Except it would have to come after tutorial? Because tutorial is part of the second wizard | 12:34 |
| sharks[m] | But no, I am not opposed to it either aside from that | 12:34 |
| Mister_Magister | it's complicated issue: let's ask what the experts think (thats what i did :D) | 12:34 |
| sharks[m] | Sure | 12:35 |
| mal | what would the additional one do? | 12:45 |
| Mister_Magister | I'm preinstalling like my apps + storeman and chum and sharks[m] wants to allow users to pick what they want instead of forcing my apps upon users by default xd | 12:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!