| piggz[m] | waydroid-sensors fixed also | 08:26 |
|---|---|---|
| poetaster | cool! | 09:15 |
| poetaster | piggz[m], I've gotten into a strange mess between fedora and suse rpm styles | 09:16 |
| poetaster | piggz[m], do you tend to orient toward the one or ther other? | 09:17 |
| piggz[m] | poetaster: generally fedora | 09:37 |
| FireFly | as a bit of an outsider to the rpm ecosystem who's only really interacted with rpmspecs through sailfish.. what's the difference? :p | 09:40 |
| poetaster | piggz[m], thanks. | 09:41 |
| poetaster | FireFly, fedora tends to be more terse with less distribution specific macros | 09:42 |
| poetaster | piggz[m], uhg, finally got, what I believe is a clean build of protobuf and libomemo | 09:46 |
| poetaster | piggz[m], should I test a specific repo (older) other than the 3 latest? | 09:46 |
| piggz[m] | poetaster: well, im not using anything old, so i dont mind :) | 10:13 |
| piggz[m] | could someone fix numpy .. as that will fix opencv and others | 10:13 |
| piggz[m] | im off on hols for a week, but ill keep checking in :D | 10:13 |
| nephros | piggz[m]: i have looked at it, and the conclusion is that there is no way to have one version support both py3.8 and 3.11. | 10:40 |
| nephros | so we will need e.g. two packages, one for older, and one for 5.1. | 10:40 |
| piggz[m] | is the source the same, or a completely different version? | 10:41 |
| nephros | different. potentially even major version different. | 10:41 |
| piggz[m] | well .. you could do what i did in the pythin-gbinder repo, and %if around different sailfish versions .. that would even let you have different sources | 10:42 |
| piggz[m] | %if 0%{sailfishos_version} <= 50000 | 10:43 |
| nephros | (s.a. irc log from sunday | 10:43 |
| piggz[m] | or, i guess add a new package numpyX which Provides: numpy etc just for 5.1 | 10:44 |
| nephros | piggz[m]: does not suffice. there is no version which can use the cython that comes with 3.8, and supports py3.11 | 10:44 |
| nephros | yes i guess. | 10:44 |
| piggz[m] | in gbinder case, it was easy enough to patch the cython file for the older version, but i guess numpy would be more complex | 10:45 |
| nephros | "python311-numpy"? or python-numpy-2 | 10:45 |
| piggz[m] | probably python311-numpy | 10:46 |
| nephros | for patching I'm probably not capable enough. | 10:46 |
| piggz[m] | just do that then, a new package | 10:47 |
| nephros | I'll prepare something. i played with _multibuild, but while that could work, tagging the packaging repo will get messy | 10:47 |
| nephros | alright, on it. | 10:47 |
| poetaster | cool. I've been avoiding it :) | 10:48 |
| poetaster | nephros, you had updated sympy to 1.13 ( i think )... any particular reason? | 10:48 |
| nephros | poetaster: does that break something? | 10:48 |
| poetaster | nephros, I don't think so. I'll try to test with Solver. I had not had need. | 10:49 |
| poetaster | nephros, https://build.sailfishos.org/project/show/home:poetaster:omemo seems clean, finally. had to work around cmake build | 10:49 |
| poetaster | oh,piggz have a nice holiday! | 10:50 |
| nephros | I don't recall - maybe it's a py3.11 support thing, or it was a case of 'because we can' | 10:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!