09:59:48 #startmeeting Mer platform SDK sync meeting 23/3/2012 09:59:48 Meeting started Fri Mar 23 09:59:48 2012 UTC. The chair is Stskeeps. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Meetings. 09:59:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 10:00:14 morning all 10:00:14 hi all, welcome to another week's platform SDK sync meeting - i'll be chairing today instead of timoph 10:00:27 let's get the status'es going :) 10:00:39 #topic Status (please prefix your progress with #info ) 10:01:07 #info main news is that we got another SDK release out with Scratchbox2 incorporated 10:01:50 #info This includes documentation and mini-tutorial at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Platform_SDK and http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Platform_SDK_and_SB2 10:02:57 #info Details for simple local compiles (using sb2) against 'any' rootfs image are provided 10:04:50 #info We've had some reports of problems building raw images using the loop devices - please help us track this issue down if you hit it 10:05:23 done as far as progress goes (I think) 10:05:31 I'll try to get automated tests done for image creation and cross compiling during the weekend with E-P 10:06:49 does latest SDK include build/osc fixes? 10:07:13 ah yes 10:08:17 anyone else has anything to report, else we'll go for planning 10:08:39 #info SDK also includes Mer version of osc and build (fixes #221 and #222 iirc) which allows OBS builds that use sb2 (ie mer-core etc) to build locally 10:10:16 ok, moving on to planning 10:10:18 #topic Plans 10:11:07 So I think the chroot SDK is about done 10:11:21 I don't want to add much more other than to fix bugs 10:12:10 maybe things like extlinux for raw images 10:12:18 I do want to provide easy installation of tool groups 10:13:08 so I think our next goals are around maintaining the SDK 10:13:18 both from a user and delivery PoV 10:13:51 so one thing is to move from using 'latest' release 10:14:08 makes sense, it's a good checkpoint for adding testcases 10:14:18 btw, is the sdk now build with mer releases? 10:14:20 and yes, to start testing 10:14:32 timoph: not concurrently, no 10:15:20 nor do we do testing on pre-releases 10:15:54 once we have some tests in place I think we can begin to do that kind of thing 10:16:02 yep 10:16:10 let me just info 10:16:49 #info Move from using 'latest' symbolic release to a named release with an easy 'upgrade to latest' mechanism 10:17:16 so I think the big one is to focus on testing 10:18:18 yes 10:18:37 hoping to have something to show after this weekend 10:18:48 along with documentation on how to do it 10:20:18 when talking about automated tests.. it's worth to note that all the things executed automagically can be executed manually as well 10:20:29 good for reproducability 10:20:38 so there's no need for everyone to setup the full TA toolchain 10:20:47 nice 10:21:28 but I think it'll be much clearer after we do it 10:21:35 it's not that complicated 10:21:54 shouldn't be :) 10:23:20 E-P: so would do you think about the testing goals? (tests for image creation and cross compilation plus docs) 10:23:36 I'd say doable over the weekend 10:24:26 I think so too, lets take couple of simple test cases first 10:24:47 yeah 10:26:22 * timoph has to go. cy 10:26:29 o/ 10:26:31 bye 10:26:34 right, any other plans? 10:27:15 after we have some tests running, we need the reporting (qa-reports example) 10:27:16 Next step for testing is to establish goals and docs over the weekend then? 10:27:42 E-P: right, a good question how to work with that 10:28:09 #info Next step for testing is to establish goals and docs over the weekend. 10:28:20 also some kind of test management would be good, what is executed and when 10:29:26 I have setup qa-reports couple of times 10:29:43 what technology is qa-reports built on? 10:29:53 ruby on rails 10:29:55 ok 10:30:03 we could put up a VM for that 10:30:40 yes, that should be enough 10:30:52 is there anything that can turn results.xml into a .pdf or similar? 10:31:01 just out of curiousity / a render or something 10:31:30 there might be, if I remember correctly 10:32:16 I have to find that out, can be that it was for the tests.xml 10:32:49 ok 10:33:06 ISTR something like that from SF ? 10:33:16 one way is to use the qa-reports and print that page to pdf 10:36:27 anyway, not the highest priority at the moment 10:36:40 E-P: can you raise a task bug to setup qa-reports please 10:37:04 when we have something up and running, then we can plan how to integrate tests to release process and/or code changes 10:37:10 (bugs.merproject.org , severity=task) 10:37:11 lbt: sure 10:37:22 should we set up a QA planning meeting sometime next week? 10:39:37 #info QA planning meeting probably a good idea 10:39:46 ok, anything else? 10:40:32 anything on Qt Creator side? 10:40:57 nothing much new there, still waiting for qtonpi release as that helps understand the setup better 10:43:23 OK 10:43:25 ok, thank you all for coming :) good meeting today 10:43:30 ty 10:43:31 #endmeeting