15:59:32 #startmeeting MeeGo Community OBS Replacement Meeting 15/05/2012 15:59:32 Meeting started Tue May 15 15:59:32 2012 UTC. The chair is vgrade_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Meetings. 15:59:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:59:59 Welcome everyone I have the Agenda at http://www.mail-archive.com/mergeneral@lists.merproject.org/msg00496.html 16:00:04 o/ 16:00:10 Last meeting log at http://mer.bfst.de/meetings/mer-meeting/2012/mer-meeting.2012-04-24-16.00.html 16:00:12 mer-general though 16:01:31 Welcome everyone I have the Agenda at http://www.mail-archive.com/mer-general@lists.merproject.org/msg00496.html 16:01:43 If you are new to this meeting give us a wave and a short intro 16:03:07 #topic 1. Mer NFP Status including progress on Donation/Sponsorship Procedures 16:03:18 lbt, Could you let us know the current status? 16:03:28 oop - sry 16:04:11 We now have a bank account. 16:04:44 Not only that, a member of the community not 100 miles from here has tested it works too 16:04:49 Thanks vgrade_ :) 16:05:20 I have not spent any time recently progressing the NFP status - too much to do with Tizen conf and Mer work 16:05:51 NP I though that would be the case 16:06:01 I did email my accountant today to verify how we could take donations from VAT registered companies and not incur VAT 16:06:40 are the bank account details on the Wiki? Or would you prefer people to contact you direct? 16:06:47 That looks reasonably easy and I'll let you know when I get confirmation 16:07:22 You know, I don't know if posting the bank details online is safe 16:07:31 I assume so ... 16:07:43 for now I'd prefer direct contact though 16:08:44 ok 16:08:57 Some of the guys over at opentablets.org asked if we were planning a Mer paypal account they could use? 16:09:26 hmm ... I think I can do that now 16:09:39 will add to the list 16:09:49 many have zenithink tablets and wanted to make a contribution direct as they did not buy a Vivaldi 16:10:15 #info bank account now available 16:10:18 *nod* 16:10:34 #info contact lbt on #mer for details 16:10:54 #info or at david@dgreaves.com 16:10:56 #info a mer paypal account to be set up 16:11:03 just watch out with paypal, we had massive problems with them in my old open source project 16:11:29 yeah, I've heard dubious things about freezing accounts and such 16:12:56 did the donation policy get approved by the AB yet? 16:13:28 I think it's up this week 16:13:57 ok, I'll leave the wiki page update 16:14:28 sadly, tightening up the rules has put one of our corporate donors off. I'll discuss that at the AB 16:15:04 ok 16:15:11 #topic 2. Legal Entity Progress 16:15:36 what's the difference between topic 1&2 ? 16:16:14 is this more about the potential need for 2 entities? 16:16:40 2 was looking at what entity would be representing the new OBS 16:17:00 so may not be Mer 16:17:00 right 16:17:16 AIUI, a separate entity from Mer for cOBS 16:18:15 so I haven't spoken to eV yet 16:18:46 The NFP and this topic will be intertwined I think 16:19:06 I'm guessing due to Tizen conf things have not moved on this 16:19:16 correct 16:19:30 I'm sure, I will combine them for next time 16:19:37 lbt: I think they should be separate 16:20:01 SD69: mmm 16:20:16 you mean you think we should have 2 entities or 2 tasks? 16:20:47 I see 1 task to determine the Mer NFP/OBS entity setup :) 16:21:19 I think we should have 2 entities, and AIUI that was the preference of Mer as well so issues from cOBS could not adversely affect Mer 16:21:51 yep - I expect that answer - I'm hoping to get eV to provide some legal advice 16:22:08 Would one be a subproject of the other? 16:22:16 how would finance sharing work? 16:22:57 so I tend to agree we'd have to do that - but equally I would like the lower overhead of just one entity. 16:23:25 the 2 entities would be legally independent, but the same individuals happen to be involved with both 16:23:54 *nod* ... I expect so... but as I say, I'd like to get a legal assesment of the risk 16:24:34 we can revisit this once we have taken advice 16:25:18 should we discuss respective contributions - from maemo, from mer? 16:25:58 financial or people 16:26:49 both I would think 16:26:58 FYI : http://www.38degrees.org.uk/pages/donations-to-38-degrees 16:27:54 this talks about earmarking funds ... I doubt we can be quite so precise but I bet we can do something to allocate donations to pools 16:28:14 ie "anything" "mer only" "cobs only" 16:28:52 fyi: 16:28:57 http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Maemo_OBS#Goals 16:29:24 ah, good - thanks 16:29:46 #info http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Maemo_OBS#Goals 16:31:54 I have nothing else on #2 :) 16:33:10 SD69: we don't have a Mer Wiki page with goals set out but this meeting I think shows we are willing to contribute 16:33:53 vgrade: we have to measure and weigh respective contributions 16:34:45 indeed it needs to be balanced 16:35:45 and not just between Mer and Maemo, others have shown an interest in using the OBS 16:36:05 co-operative fashion, if you use more, you're expected to contribute more..? 16:36:12 I'm not sure how the commitment of people could be managed though 16:36:56 I want to develop some monitoring for OBS anyway 16:37:17 big brother :) 16:37:33 IT capacity planning :) 16:37:39 vgrade: what others? and what will they contribute? 16:37:48 PA for example 16:38:24 yes Aaron contributed to one our our earlier meetings 16:38:43 what will PA contribute to the cOBS? 16:39:13 they'd discussed financing it 16:39:49 good, $$$ is always welcome 16:39:56 A monetry contribution from the profits from Vivaldi tablet have been earmarked to be fed back into PA and Mer community 16:40:31 see Aarons blog for details 16:40:47 All accounts will be open too - we haven't decided how to deal with anonymity yet AFAIR 16:40:59 I'm proceeding on the presumption that cOBS will be related but in some ways independent project 16:41:12 from Mer 16:41:36 SD69: yep - I kinda want to keep the funding in one place though 16:42:08 I think an allocation policy like 38degrees will make this more palatable 16:42:30 so PA and Maemo may decide to contribute funds earmarked only for c.OBS 16:42:41 or 90% c.OBS or something 16:44:01 I need to move things on to the last item 16:44:03 #topic 3. Feedback from Maemo OBS discussions 16:44:14 http://mg.pov.lt/maemo-meeting-irclog/%23maemo-meeting.2012-05-07.log.html 16:44:15 we support Mer, but I hope you are not presuming that maemo is going to put its server/cOBS resources under Mer governance 16:44:29 http://mg.pov.lt/maemo-meeting-irclog/%23maemo-meeting.2012-05-14.log.html 16:44:43 SD69: yes we were assuming that 16:45:24 can you clarify a bit? 16:45:32 I hope nothing I have said has suggested that - I thought there would be separate entities 16:45:34 well, i think cOBS could have it's own governance as such, made up of the participants? 16:46:01 hmm 16:46:16 stskeeps: that's what I thought from previous meetings 16:46:20 my head was in sysadmin space 16:46:54 i don't see any particular reason why it has to be mer governance, just that it has to be a shared effort (and cost) 16:46:57 so I expected the cobs to be a part of the Mer infrastructure mgmt domain 16:47:12 maemo is not going to donate $$ to cOBS (we don't have any) 16:47:26 cost being resources even, like workers 16:47:38 in terms of organisational governance ... that's different 16:49:18 long story short: we just need some kind of governance on the cobs that works and is balanced and co-operative 16:49:39 if it's mer infra 'handling' the obs itself, by directives from governance.. sure, why not 16:49:43 * timoph is late 16:49:46 might even be KDE or maemo.org in the future 16:51:52 .. did i derail the conversation? 16:52:50 stskeeps: i think i am in agreement with what you said 16:53:17 I like the idea of balanced and co-operative 16:53:20 i can't but feel we need organisational diagrams by now.. :P 16:53:29 except I think KDe might be an issue 16:54:12 SD69: why? 16:54:29 vgrade: petty stuff 16:54:54 the important thing is to delegate a team that handles the community OBS, and it's as simple as that.. if the chosen implementation is by implementing it utilizing the Mer infra setup + some external maemo.org workers, then it's just that isn't it? 16:55:28 have a sort of tsg for it to sort out differences when needed? presentation from eatch project. day-to-day admins can be different 16:55:40 stskeeps: I think so, but no need to reach a decision today, is there? 16:55:58 correct 16:56:04 no , we have a while yet to get the people round the table again 16:56:08 we do have some security issues - I need the maemo workers to have very limited access 16:56:23 :nod: 16:56:36 to what? 16:56:45 mer core, etc? 16:56:49 ie pretty much me + X-Fade + phaeron type people would be the only ones to be allowed root 16:57:00 Stskeeps: can you take over and do the end meeting I have to catch a bus 16:57:03 * timoph got it 16:57:12 vgrade_: type #chair Stskeeps 16:57:23 #chair Stskeeps 16:57:23 Current chairs: Stskeeps vgrade_ 16:57:35 thanks people 16:57:39 bye 16:57:40 thanks vgrade_ 16:57:43 o/ 16:57:55 bye 16:57:58 anyway, Feedback from Maemo OBS discussions 16:58:06 SD69: so when you asked about governance ... that was in my mind 16:58:08 did you have a meeting revolving around technical issues, etc? 16:58:23 Stskeeps: we did 16:58:48 #link http://mg.pov.lt/maemo-meeting-irclog/%23maemo-meeting.2012-05-14.log.html 16:59:03 i'm working on a new OBS SB2 approach that will make enabling fremantle and co a -lot- easier as well 16:59:45 and I'd like to get some of the Maemo targets added to our OBS test suite 17:00:27 so a minimal fremantle sysroot? 17:00:43 timoph: that kind of thing 17:00:52 dunno if it contains some closed stuff? 17:00:58 might be an issue 17:01:28 not the deepest code that validates a build, at least 17:02:36 have you maemo.org guys managed to get any volunteers besides X-Fade to attempt any obs experiments yet? 17:02:38 but anyway. the maemo obs thing is basically pending for X-Fade to resolve some issues with arm builds 17:02:39 or even QA people 17:02:55 * timoph volunteered 17:02:58 ok 17:03:39 javispedro was in the 2nd meeting too 17:03:44 stskeeps: we have just a couple 17:03:50 I also volunteered, mostly to try and fix potential packaging problems 17:03:51 anything above 0 is good :) 17:04:00 :) 17:05:44 okay, so, anything else to report? 17:06:28 not really 17:06:43 okay, if there's no objections, i'll close the meeting - thank you all for coming 17:06:57 nothing else 17:07:03 thanks 17:07:48 SD69: could you have a think about what kind of governance you were thinking of 17:08:36 and what kind of 'authority' a c.obs steering group should have 17:08:51 lbt: I will talk some amongst maemo people 17:09:06 who may be on it (ie major users/contributors whatever that means) 17:09:22 ta 17:09:39 I don't want to gloss over things that may matter to people :) 17:10:09 #action SD69 to think about what kind of governance he was thinking of 17:10:16 ok, closing 17:10:18 #endmeeting