11:00:44 #startmeeting Mer Bug Triage 9/7/2012 11:00:44 Meeting started Mon Jul 9 11:00:44 2012 UTC. The chair is iekku. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Meetings. 11:00:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 11:00:57 #topic We'll start with the new bugs: 11:00:59 #link https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=trivial&bug_severity=enhancement&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=TRIAGEDUPSTREAM&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=need-triage&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&order=bug_id 11:01:12 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170 contribution_in_detail: [new] git clone / push commands wrong? 11:01:34 REMEMBER: if you'd like to take a bug, please just indicate during or after the bug 11:01:40 lbt, can you fdo the areed changes? 11:01:49 yup 11:01:57 agreed and do 11:01:59 thanks 11:02:28 nb - no-one else should edit these bugs during meeting to avoid in-flight collisions 11:02:56 they are so annoying 11:03:38 is this still valid? 11:03:57 hmm, needs checking against SDK 11:04:00 lbt can probably comment 11:04:05 it could be a git version issue 11:04:15 II'll take it 11:04:42 #info needs checking against SDK, lbt taking 11:04:43 high as it's a key part of our docs/process 11:04:52 #info high 11:05:12 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407 [META] Very essential #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=performance tools needs to be included / packaged 11:05:33 wasn't sure how to handle metas (i think this is first) so i brought it here 11:06:06 feels like we should have someone manage this kind of bug 11:06:14 maybe release mgmt? 11:06:40 Stskeeps: ? 11:06:50 mm, yeah, assign over to me 11:06:58 medium prio 11:07:35 next? 11:07:44 #info assigned to: Stskeeps , normal 11:07:49 hmm 11:07:59 actually, I'll take it as SDK maintainer 11:08:13 #info lbt taking as SDK maintainer 11:08:18 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409 uxlaunch leaves X running when it can't start a session; then cycles, causing focus to swap to X from tty 11:08:40 normal, it should raelly behave better 11:08:49 #info normal 11:08:57 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410 Do not complain about installing tests to /opt/tests/ 11:09:12 low 11:09:19 is it in rpmlint-MeeGo component? 11:09:21 iekku: I propose meta bugs are assigned to area maintainers for overseeing during triage - delegated if desired 11:09:36 Stskeeps: yes 11:09:39 ok 11:09:53 lbt, agreed 11:10:07 #info low 11:10:17 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411 Get rid of verbose info of attached input devices 11:10:55 normal, pretty annoying 11:10:58 fills up xsession-errors 11:11:21 #info normal, pretty annoying fills up xsession-errors 11:11:29 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412 openssl is not installable on all architectures 11:11:49 this is a major pain 11:11:56 high 11:11:59 +1 11:11:59 seems to break SDK updates too 11:12:01 and release blocker OK 11:12:06 +1 11:12:06 yes 11:12:16 #info high, release blocker 11:12:34 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 Build loops happen 11:13:15 build loops will happen, but nss is a bad one 11:13:19 there's another bug regarding that 11:13:25 low/normal as it affects vendors and QA time 11:13:59 normal 11:14:05 mmm 11:14:20 I think there are higher prio issues 11:14:25 so I'd say low 11:14:32 :) 11:14:34 not many people rebuild mer core a lot 11:14:35 #info low 11:14:50 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415 build-compare needs to check for /usr/lib and not only /lib for nss .chk files 11:14:58 connected with 413 11:15:03 similar issue 11:15:24 #info connected to 413, similar issue. low 11:15:40 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416 Mer contribution should not require a OBS in order to do so 11:16:21 back to 413 11:16:24 normal or low, we need to provide 'offline' 'build' capability 11:16:31 415 I mean 11:16:37 should 413 block 415 ? 11:16:48 lbt, i think so 11:17:25 (inverse ... done, moving on) 11:17:52 Stskeeps: ah 11:18:03 I completely misunderstood 11:18:05 maybe even normal 11:18:11 you meant no tcp connection 11:18:14 not no OBS 11:18:49 "Mer contribution should not require an OBS network connection in order to build" ?? 11:18:57 416 is about that it should be possible to do without osc 11:19:02 ie, 'build' calls 11:19:18 should the summary be changed? 11:19:42 sorry, not sure 11:19:51 is this "osc should not be needed" 11:20:05 yes, ie, obs account/obs and osc should not be needed 11:20:13 why? 11:20:16 ie, be able to build a package with use of a mer release 11:20:25 because, very simple, not everybody has an obs, or obs account 11:20:26 I mean sure ... but looking at the load we have 11:20:55 ok, low 11:21:01 it's one thing that would be good to have, IMHO 11:21:15 and is related to good developer workflow 11:21:16 so, acceptance criterea? 11:21:32 'i can build a mer package against mer core without involving a OBS" 11:21:36 'on my local machine' 11:21:39 in platform sdk 11:22:08 MDS ? 11:22:25 MDS may or may not be involved, at least a mer release snapshot of some kind 11:22:27 or http repos only 11:22:36 anyway, it's low, we can discuss more in bug 11:22:56 #info low, more discussion in bug 11:23:06 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417 Remove udev module from repos 11:23:13 OK - but I'm doing quickbuild - hence the interest 11:23:28 udev will be removed with systemd update 11:23:29 assign to me 11:23:32 normal prio 11:23:36 task? 11:23:50 task 11:24:13 #info task, Stskeeps takes, will be removed with systemd update. normal 11:24:22 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418 openssl-1.0.1b-1.1.i586 package is not installable - missing libcrypto.so.10 11:25:18 dupe 412? 11:25:55 mmmm 11:26:03 yes, libcrypto missing is the (misleading) error message during install 11:26:23 if we resolve it as duplicate, i think the comments needs to be added to 412 11:26:31 good info 11:26:49 ok 11:27:06 iekku: it does not contain additional useful info 11:27:13 Aard, ok then 11:27:30 #info duplicate for 412 11:27:40 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420 rpmlint says /usr/bin/python is not found when building in OBS 11:27:44 Aard: agreed 11:27:52 low, cosmetic 11:28:00 #info low, cosmetic 11:28:06 #topic Moving on to tasks: https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?emailassigned_to1=1&query_format=advanced&bug_severity=task&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=TRIAGEDUPSTREAM&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=need-triage&emailtype1=substring&order=bug_id 11:28:14 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419 Testrunner results preview should work offline 11:28:31 why should it look for python in /opt/testing ? 11:28:41 lbt: look at rpmlint-mini at some point 11:28:52 and you'd understand 11:29:17 it's needed for not insane cycles in base system 11:29:19 added to comments :) 11:29:33 normal? 11:29:55 low, it's simply that when at conferences, or meeting rooms, things don't look good 11:29:59 as it fetches resources online 11:30:06 ok 11:30:06 erm 11:30:09 with bad wifi 11:30:12 421 ? 11:30:22 419 11:30:31 what about 421? :P 11:30:36 I have 421 as an outstanding bug 11:30:49 lbt, true 11:31:05 #info low 11:31:13 let's quickly take 421 11:31:17 #info Task list is now: https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=task&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=not-taken%40&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&order=priority%2Cbug_id&query_based_on= 11:31:22 #info Not taken bugs: https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=trivial&bug_severity=enhancement&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=not-taken%40&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&order=priority%2Cbug_id&query_based_on= 11:31:39 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421 - bluetoothd complains about missing "/etc/bluetooth/input.conf" 11:32:03 low? 11:32:06 should this depend on some kind of HA? 11:32:12 No 11:32:14 maybe, needs to be inspected 11:32:22 I think it's just a generic config file. 11:32:38 bug in packaging then ? 11:32:48 Yeah, should probably just be empty. 11:33:03 My input.conf in ubuntu is pretty empty. 11:33:26 OK ...I'm looking for HA specific interfaces for packages like this 11:33:32 (FYI) 11:34:24 so? 11:34:34 normal? 11:34:43 #info normal 11:34:57 #topic review the task list and adjust according to discussion and plans: 11:35:02 #link https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=task&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=TRIAGEDUPSTREAM&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=not-taken&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&query_based_on=&columnlist=bug_severity%2Cpriority%2Cshort_desc%2Ccomponent 11:35:07 422 11:35:31 sry ... but it just keeps going by itself :) 11:35:47 lbt, there's also 423 11:35:51 and 242 11:36:12 422 is dependency issues with ofono-tests packing 11:36:12 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422 - ofono-test package requires python dbus bindings. 11:36:15 OK - so somehow I guess a list got trimmed 11:36:35 ofono-test shoudl depend on python-dbus and pygobject2 11:36:42 lbt, they have arrived after i sent invitation 11:36:47 ah 11:37:26 but let's go them through 11:37:51 normal? 11:37:56 i think so 11:38:02 based on alterego's comment 11:38:23 #info normal: ofono-test shoudl depend on python-dbus and pygobject2 11:38:44 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 - specify uses sys.environ, not os.environ 11:39:02 low trivial 11:39:12 #info low trivial 11:39:32 #topic https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424 - ca-certificates installation problem wthile upgrading SDK 11:39:50 release blocker for SDK I think 11:39:55 high 11:39:58 that's a really annoying one 11:40:01 :nod: 11:40:12 #info high, release blocker for SDK 11:40:12 yep 11:40:38 back to agenda 11:40:39 #topic review the task list and adjust according to discussion and plans: 11:40:40 #link https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=task&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=TRIAGEDUPSTREAM&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=not-taken&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&query_based_on=&columnlist=bug_severity%2Cpriority%2Cshort_desc%2Ccomponent 11:41:40 anything to change? 11:42:55 not here 11:43:05 can we sort that by importance? 11:43:05 ok 11:43:13 from now on 11:43:20 sure! 11:43:49 iekku: I put some links + scripts on the bugs wiki page ... do you know about them ? 11:44:05 lbt, i have seen them 11:44:13 :) 11:44:14 not sure how to use them 11:44:25 lets take it later 11:44:42 prod me 11:45:07 https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=task&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=TRIAGEDUPSTREAM&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=bug_severity%2Cpriority%2Cshort_desc%2Ccomponent&email1=not-taken&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&order=priority%2Cbug_id&query_based_on= 11:46:22 all done on tasks? 11:46:39 i think so 11:46:41 #topic search for bugs that are assigned: 11:46:43 #link https://bugs.merproject.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=bug_severity%2Cpriority%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Ccomponent%2Cchangeddate&field0-0-0=assigned_to&field0-1-0=assigned_to&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=notequals&type0-1-0=notequals&value0-0-0=need-triage%40merproject.org&value0-1-0=not-taken%40merproject.org&order=changeddate%2Cbug_id&q 11:46:49 and that was all 11:47:10 if there's nothing else we can close 11:47:19 quick bug review 11:47:46 going to get my name off the list this week 11:47:48 :) 11:48:12 I'll check some of the IT ones on an upcoming 'lbt infra day' 11:48:25 :nod: 11:49:31 are we done with todays meeting? 11:49:38 yes think so 11:49:44 yeah - that bug list need TLC 11:50:20 so... 11:50:34 should we arrange a bug squashing session? 11:50:54 perhaps a day dedicated to getting some things off the board 11:50:56 if we allocate a half day to it and focus 11:50:58 hehe 11:51:21 yeah - all at the same time so it's more productive 11:51:43 how about next wednesday? 11:51:52 this week? 11:51:58 next wednesday. 11:51:58 18 July 11:52:14 gives us some time to tell people and let them free up some time 11:52:43 mmm 11:53:09 let's have it in 18th then 11:53:16 hopefully i'm available 11:54:10 #info bug squashing 18th of july 11:54:33 can you send out an email too 11:54:50 sure i can 11:55:05 need to figure out first what to tell 11:55:05 I think the focus should be on fixing bugs, not training... thoughts? 11:55:21 happy to have another day on handholding 11:55:23 and how to organize it 11:55:42 *nod* 11:55:42 and where 11:55:43 thanks 11:55:57 let's continue about that on #mer 11:56:33 #action iekku to send email info/invitation to bug squashing 11:56:45 i think we are donw for today 11:57:11 yup - ty 11:57:19 thanks! 11:57:22 #endmeeting