07:00:16 #startmeeting Sailfish OS, open source, collaboration -- 14th Sep 2023 07:00:16 Meeting started Thu Sep 14 07:00:16 2023 UTC. The chair is rainemak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 07:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 07:00:27 #info Meeting information and agenda can be found here: 07:00:32 #link https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-irc-14th-september-2023/16646 07:00:40 I am the meeting's chairperson today, and will be doing my best to keep time and order. Please respect the timings and bee-hive. 07:00:40 #topic Brief introduction (5 min). Please prefix your name/handle with #info 07:00:47 #info Otto Mäkelä, community 07:01:03 #info David Llewellyn-Jones, community 07:01:10 Hi. Good morning. 07:02:32 #info Raine Mäkeläinen, sailor @ Jolla, chairperson today 07:03:11 #info Pami Ketolainen, sailor @ Jolla 07:03:13 I'm very pleased to see good amount of topics raised 07:04:55 #info JP Walden, sailor @ Jolla 07:05:36 It's a tie 3-3 - counting Alan[m] to community 07:05:42 #info Sebix, community 07:05:54 Community wins! ?? 07:05:57 community won :-) 07:06:06 let's move to first topic 07:06:10 #topic SailfishOS Edition of the Pinephone Pro (10 mins -- asked by piggz) 07:06:20 #info I have been approached by Pine64, who would like to make available an edition of the PinephonePro pre-loaded with 07:06:20 #info my SailfishOS port on the Pine store. I am more than happy for this to happen (with some caveats) and would like to 07:06:20 #info know if Jolla would be against this in any particularly strong way. There is precedence for something like this, the 07:06:20 #info “Jolla Devices” store sells sony xperias pre-loaded with the free editions of SailfishOS, and I would of-course not be 07:06:23 #info shipping any of the components that typically require the SailfishX license. I see this good PR and advertising for 07:06:26 #info Jolla and it will only make Sailfish more known. 07:06:28 #info (the caveats are that i feel the Pro version of the sailfish os port is not as stable/usable as for the regular 07:06:31 #info pinephone just yet, so i would like this to be made clear so as to not disappoint users, and hopefully it would bring 07:06:34 #info in more developers) 07:06:38 ​#info It would be greatly appreciated if you could reach out to me before the meeting, so that the details can be worked out 07:06:41 #info with Pine. If you have any conditions, then I would of-course be more than happy to do my best. (for example, DanctNix 07:06:44 #info which is based on arch, does not use the name Arch so to be less associated with that project, would you want to not 07:06:47 #info use the Sailfish name?) 07:07:04 #info First, it’s great to hear that you were approached by Pine64 regarding your Pine Phone Pro port. There shouldn’t be 07:07:04 #info major roadblocks in this. However, there are different aspects that we should clarify & check. We shared some details & 07:07:04 #info questions to piggz. 07:07:14 #info Please do not mix that webshop that sells pre-installed free editions of SailfishOS to this. As far as I know, it is the free version Sailfish OS by Jolla that is produced in Sailfish X program not a community edition. 07:08:38 Something happen to wrapping... Hopefully can parse above 07:08:55 It makes sense here :) 07:09:27 First time I hear of that webshop, I assume it has nothing to do with Jolla? 07:09:50 Correct, it has nothing to do with Jolla 07:11:54 #info piggz community ... seems matrix isnt bridging here :) 07:12:08 rainemak: you asked about editing the About dialog ... how possible is that? 07:13:13 Hopefully I see latest image today on Pine Phone Pro 07:13:36 Then I can say about the actual details regarding the content 07:13:44 great ... dont get too excited, ood its not great, but with a zypper dup it should work better ... 07:13:56 i also have a custom ofono build that works better than the default i think 07:14:36 So, the answer is there are no major objections, hopefully some tweaks and its possible to have consent? 07:14:50 Settings -> About product is relatively simple to customize from kickstart as needed 07:15:03 ah, i didnt know that 07:15:13 you could pR the kickstart :) 07:15:31 I can try to share you some pointers later 07:15:36 gr8 07:16:06 piggz, "So, the answer is there are no major objections, hopefully some tweaks and its possible to have consent?" => Yes, that sounds about right 07:17:09 is this covered? are we good to move on? 07:17:12 This is amazing! 07:17:18 superb ... i look forward to helping out when you get your pro ... there are several things you need to know about bootloaders and firmware to get the best experience 07:17:25 flypig_: yes :) 07:17:31 Three cheers for piggz and Jolla :D 07:17:59 #topic regarding keyboard input issues in android apps (6 mins -- asked by thigg) 07:18:12 #link https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/aliendalvik-aas-typing-characters-after-deleting-typed-text-often-inserts-the-deleted-string/14046 07:18:22 #info there are two issues with keyboard input in some android apps. One is that deleted text appears again and the other 07:18:22 #info that after placing the cursor added text sometimes is inserted at the previous location. It looks like the issue is 07:18:22 #info around for quite a while and I’d like to help to find the cause. Can you describe how the input is actually passed and 07:18:23 #info if we have a chance from the community side to investigate into this? 07:18:57 #info We don’t know exactly what the issue is, more investigation needed. We have seen the issue, but this hasn’t been a 07:18:57 #info priority. There are some stub Android methods in our “RemoteKeyboard” component and those might be relevant. 07:19:22 #info Easiest to help via the forum ticket. 07:20:48 (I've also occasionally seen this, and I've tried to understand when it happens, to no avail -- it only seems to happen when it is the most inconvenient, so I'm suspecting AI intereference) 07:21:25 ExTechOp, there are quite good steps reported in the forum ticket 07:21:40 and yes it's annoying 07:22:47 We have a lot of topics still. If no objects, let's move 07:23:02 #topic Updating the Linux kernel headers (10 mins -- asked by flypig) 07:23:12 #info Currently the Sailfish OS repos contain kernel headers for Linux 3.18. Is there scope for them to be updated in future 07:23:13 #info releases? The motivation is that Gecko ESR 91 requires the linux/membarrier.h header (specifically __NR_membarrier) 07:23:13 #info which was introduced in kernel headers 4.3. Gecko checks at runtime that the capabilities are available before using 07:23:13 #info them. With thanks to @mal for his help with this. 07:23:14 #info Related links: 07:23:16 #info 1. Upstream change that makes this useful: D88395 Bug 1661016: aarch64: Invalidate icache when compiling on a background thread; r=nbp,lth 07:23:19 #link https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D88395 07:23:21 #info 2. Sailfish kernel-headers repo: GitHub - sailfishos/kernel-headers 07:23:23 #link https://github.com/sailfishos/kernel-headers/ 07:23:25 #info 3. Sailfish pre-build linux 5.4 headers: Show nemo:devel:hw:native-common / kernel-headers - SailfishOS Open Build Service 07:23:28 #link https://build.sailfishos.org/package/show/nemo:devel:hw:native-common/kernel-headers 07:23:30 #info 4. Comparing Linux headers: __NR_membarrier identifier - Linux source code (v4.3) - Bootlin 07:23:33 #link https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.3/C/ident/__NR_membarrier 07:23:37 #info 5. Background: Gecko-dev Diary 07:23:39 #link https://www.flypig.co.uk/gecko?&list_id=855&list=gecko 07:23:43 #info Thank you for raising this. Something that we should look at some point. 07:24:21 Certainly, we should help you flypig_ regarding esr91 efforts 07:24:46 Thanks; regarding the headers, mal has already been a big help. It's not a blocker, but I wanted to flag it anyway. 07:25:21 And in fact, I've had lots of help from all over the place (inside and outside Jolla). And I really appreciate it! 07:25:36 Nice to hear! 07:25:47 Are there still devices running a <4.3 kernel? 07:27:10 Supported ones, I don't think so. Jolla Phone required older kernel header. 07:27:23 My X10 III is on 4.19.248. 07:27:35 I guess some community builds may be then. 07:27:48 That's very plausible 07:28:44 flypig_, you find with the answer? I'm trying to speed up a bit :-) 07:28:50 Okay; well, thanks for the answer, it'd be great if Jolla finds time to look at this although I understand if not. I'm happy for us to move on :) 07:28:53 s/find/fine/ 07:29:02 Thank you, yes! All fine! 07:29:13 #topic Stabilizing TextArea.focusOutBehavior (5 mins -- asked by direc85) 07:29:22 #info Jolla Messages keeps the keyboard open after the message has been sent, so sending the next message is easier. 07:29:22 #info Whisperfish, a Signal client, would have benefited from the same behaviour from the start, but we couldn’t figure out 07:29:22 #info how it was done. Eventually I stumbled upon the solution while looking for something else – see Whisperfish issue 489 07:29:23 #info 1 – it turned out to be the TextArea.focusOutBehavior, which is an undocumented property, inherited from the private 07:29:26 #info side. Could Jolla stabilize the property and document it so other applications could easier replicate the same 07:29:29 #info behaviour? 07:29:31 #link https://gitlab.com/whisperfish/whisperfish/-/merge_requests/489 07:29:37 #info Example apps sailfishsilica-qt5-demos and sailfishsilica-qt5-demos-private are good examples that could be used to 07:29:38 #info check how components can be used. Whether a property is inherited from the private TextBase or not is not a problem. 07:29:41 #info TextField documentation already have properties and methods documented that are coming from the TextBase. Your 07:29:44 #info suggestion to document focusOutBehavior sounds like a good idea. 07:30:43 Are the docs generated from docstrings in a closed repo? 07:30:58 yes and yes 07:31:11 Okay, so no scope for community to create a PR. Just checking. 07:31:12 there's actually follow up to this in next topic 07:31:37 direc85 couldn't participate I think we'll just move on 07:31:50 #topic Improving Silica documentation (10 mins -- asked by direc85) 07:31:59 #info There are typos, mistakes and simply wrong information in the Silica documentation 1. Example: By documentation, 07:31:59 #info PageStack.push() takes var page, PageStack.replace() takes int page and PageStack.nextPage() takes Page page – by 07:31:59 #info experiments I can tell they all take Page type variable. I mentioned about this in the #sailfishos channel some 07:31:59 #info months ago, but it was not reacted to, even there was now active conversation after that for some time (if my memory 07:32:02 #info serves me right). Another example of vast amount of missing data is list of inherited methods and properties. As Qt 07:32:07 #info documentation website defaults to Qt 6, manually jumping to version Qt 5.6 needs to be done often, so having even the 07:32:10 #info Qt part of the list would be most helpful. Could the current documentation be opened to pull requests so community 07:32:13 #info could contribute to it? If not, what is the preferred way for the community to contribute? 07:32:40 #info Thank you for your input. There’s clearly an error in the PageStack.replace() – let's fix that. The PageStack.nextPage 07:32:40 #info is not similar to PageStack.push nor to PageStack.replace as PageStack.nextPage is a lookup function that returns the 07:32:40 #info page that follows fromPage argument (instance of a Page). Whereas both push and replace allow lazy page creation by 07:32:40 #info passing Page Component or by passing url (usually used along with Qt.resolvedUrl). In addition, both push and replace 07:32:43 #info accept a Page instance or an array of Page instances. This is the reason why these two take var argument. 07:33:11 #info 07:33:11 #info Hint: from application start up and Page creation point of view many times best approach is to use resolved url as it 07:33:11 #info defers both component compilation and object creation at the point when a page is really needed. Thus, avoids 07:33:11 #info unnecessary compilation and instance creations. Instantiating Page instances ahead of time is not usually good idea. 07:33:12 #info You can accidentally write your QML so Pages are created too early for example by declaring needed Pages somewhere 07:33:15 #info without wrapping them to Components. 07:33:17 #info 07:33:45 #info Documenting Qt properties and methods as part of Silica documentation is tricky. Certainly, we understand and see your 07:33:45 #info point that it would be helpful to have. 07:33:45 #info 07:33:57 #info We haven’t really considered opening only documentation parts of closed repositories as that’s currently part of the 07:33:57 #info same repository as the source codes. 07:34:14 #info 07:34:14 #info Preferred way for community to contribute would be raising API documentation issues in the forum. We can consider 07:34:14 #info creating a separate category for API documentation discussion if there would be plenty of discussion. If that is 07:34:14 #info preferred approach, please let us know. 07:36:29 Comments? 07:36:34 I suppose this relates to all the documentation under https://sailfishos.org/develop/docs/ (not just Silica docs)? 07:36:48 not all but most 07:37:06 Okay; some is in open repos. 07:37:13 correct 07:37:35 but mangling Qt docs and/link to the Sailfish docs is tricky for them all 07:37:46 and/or links 07:38:21 What are the alternatives (I'm not saying these are *good* alternatives): 1) Put the code in open repos with a closed license. 2) Put the html in a repo for people to create PRs against which Jolla could then transfer. 3)....? 07:39:39 Putting html to a repo doesn't sound right 07:40:10 but having qdoc files in open could maybe work 07:40:10 Is there a way to output just the docstring source? It sounds messy. 07:40:15 You can use qdoc config to link to the qt doc archive pages for 5.6 but it will require modificatiin of the source qdoc comments. 07:41:23 nephros_, linking is different that I'm thinking... I thinking more about bundling. 07:42:16 there's clearly some food for thoughts - let's continue this discussion at the end if we have time left 07:42:35 #topic Open PR discussion (10 mins -- asked by jolla / flypig) 07:42:35 Just to say, if there is a way to get the qdoc files out, that would be really neat. 07:43:07 #info These are all Gecko ESR 91 related. These aren’t stuck, I’m just raising them in case there’s any need to discuss them. 07:43:07 #info 07:43:07 #info ICU 70.1 (thanks for looking at this already) 07:43:07 #info Open PR URL: Update to version 70.1 by llewelld · Pull Request #1 · sailfishos/icu · GitHub 1 07:43:08 #link https://github.com/sailfishos/icu/pull/1 07:43:18 #info This was merged already. 07:43:21 Hooray! 07:43:34 #info GCC backported patch (special thanks to direct85 for this) 07:43:34 #info 07:43:34 #info 07:43:34 #info Open PR URL: [gcc] Prefer bsl/bit/bif for copysignf. (backport GCC-8) by direc85 · Pull Request #4 · sailfishos/gcc · GitHub 07:43:34 #link https://github.com/sailfishos/gcc/pull/4 07:43:37 #info Related thread: Compiling GCC for SDK 07:43:39 #info Query: Is there a way to get the aarch64 build on OBS to complete so I can test this; alternatively is there 07:43:42 #info a way to do ‘dumb’ builds using the local SDK? 07:44:42 I think simplest probably would be community OBS but we could also give a spin 07:44:53 As it happens the latest changes built for aarch64 on OBS last night, so I can now test this on the gecko source. I don't think it makes sense to merge it before that. 07:44:56 https://build.sailfishos.org/package/show/home:flypig:gecko-esr91/gcc 07:45:43 A massive thanks to mal, Keto and direc85 for all their work and help with this. 07:46:15 Indeed! Great effort! 07:46:27 #info cbindgen 0.19.0 (thanks for all the useful feedback on this as well) 07:46:27 #info Open PR URL: [packaging] Update to version 0.19.0 by llewelld · Pull Request #7 · sailfishos/rust-cbindgen · GitHub 1 07:46:27 #info https://github.com/sailfishos/rust-cbindgen/pull/7 07:46:27 #info This was merged as well. 07:46:32 Hooray! 07:46:35 re gcc ... does that include c++20 support? 07:46:55 It's not an update to gcc I'm afraid, it's just backporting of a patch to fix a specific crash bug. 07:47:13 ah ok .. im wondering if/when c++20 will be on sfos 07:47:21 do you want to hear nice tiny little funny thingie? 07:47:24 just becuase i happen to have been asked this morning by some kde devs! 07:47:32 rainemak: sure 07:47:40 Absolutely :) 07:48:22 after icu & rust-cbindgen got integrated your devel xulrunner build finally successfully for armv7hl 07:48:37 s/your/our/ 07:49:39 xulrunner has been long time borken for armv7hl and we haven't figured why it was borken. 07:49:51 Oh, wow. With this new info, do you know why it was? 07:49:58 my bets are on rust-cbindgen and something changed in the generated code 07:50:11 That's a bit crazy! 07:50:23 that's great news! 07:50:57 yeap 07:51:05 #info Any other open PRs to discuss? 07:51:07 xulrunner is a carefully balanced tower, it seems! 07:51:27 moving on 07:51:29 #topic Untracked bug reports (5 min -- asked by pherjung) 07:51:38 #info Untracked bug reports 07:51:38 #link https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-irc-14th-september-2023/16646/3 07:51:45 #info The Community Bug Coordination Team have done a superb job once again this fortnight. 07:51:45 #info 07:51:45 #info As a result of their work, we now have: 07:51:45 #info 9 high quality bug reports now recorded internally and tagged as "tracked". 07:51:45 #info 4 bug reports marked as "pending" more info. 07:51:46 #info 3 bug reports tagged as "fixed". 07:51:48 #info 1 marked as duplicates and closed. 07:52:16 Four more bugs down! Great stuff. 07:52:39 jpwalden checked and flagged both https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-irc-14th-september-2023/16646/3 and https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-irc-17th-august-2023/15962/2 07:53:13 Much appreciated 07:53:21 Great work all! 07:53:29 Let's move on to the general discussion. 07:53:38 #topic General discussion (5 min) 07:54:29 rainemak: this comment from vige says gcc update is tracked internally, can i infer that means its planned to be updated? https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/gcc-update-from-gcc-8/15144/10?u=piggz 07:55:20 piggz, it's tracked but also a big effort 07:55:30 I just want to put on record thanks to Thaodan and you rainemak as well, along with mal, Keto and direc85[m] for the help with those PRs. Sorry if I forgot anyone. 07:55:58 id also like to say thanks for accepting the PPP proposal 07:56:30 piggz, do you have a timeline for when it will happen? 07:56:30 piggz, I'll try to get back to you in a week with more details 07:56:35 can't wait to see a ppp with a fish printed on the back :) 07:57:01 abr: not sure they will be printing cusot cases :( 07:57:05 s/custom 07:57:33 that was the original PP community editions ... this i think will just be a PPP preloaded 07:57:38 I just want to say thank you all regarding the meeting input 07:57:41 ah ok. it'll have to be a sticker then... 07:58:08 we're running out of time 07:58:15 let's schedule next meeting 07:58:19 Thanks for all the answers rainemak. 07:58:32 #topic Next meeting time and date (2 min) 07:58:32 Proposing Thursday 28th September at 07:00am UTC. 07:58:45 Works4me. 07:59:11 No clock changes; no holidays; looks good :D 07:59:21 :D 07:59:33 #info Next meeting will be held on Thursday 28th September 2023 at 07:00am UTC: 2023-09-28T0700Z 07:59:47 Thank you all! 07:59:49 Thank you, everybody! 07:59:51 thx 07:59:51 Thank you! 08:00:10 #endmeeting