12:00:51 #startmeeting Mer advisory board meeting 5/4/2012 12:00:51 Meeting started Thu Apr 5 12:00:51 2012 UTC. The chair is Stskeeps. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Meetings. 12:00:51 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 12:01:27 welcome to another advisory board meeting, http://www.mail-archive.com/mer-general@lists.merproject.org/msg00399.html is our agenda today 12:01:31 afternoon 12:01:53 i don't think we have quorom today, but there's not terribly much to vote on 12:02:23 #topic Confirm minutes from http://mer.bfst.de/meetings/mer-meeting/2012/mer-meeting.2012-03-16-12.00.html 12:02:39 any objections to the minutes as presented and the logs? 12:02:47 no 12:03:15 no 12:03:18 alright, moving on .. 12:03:26 #topic Project news from architect 12:04:17 #link http://www.mail-archive.com/mer-general@lists.merproject.org/msg00377.html - Mer 0.20120315.1 release 12:04:51 #info LLVMpipe and libjpeg-turbo for better virtual machine development and demoing, and JPEG decoding using accelerated methods on some processors 12:05:22 #info http://www.mail-archive.com/mer-general@lists.merproject.org/msg00409.html - Mer prerelease for 0.20120405.0.1 on the way, focus on eglibc 2.15 switch 12:05:56 #link http://review.merproject.org/494 - First qt5 packaging has been submitted, 12:06:38 #info First Mer QA meeting, organised by E-P 12:07:02 #link http://mer.bfst.de/meetings/mer-meeting/2012/mer-meeting.2012-04-03-11.00.html for minutes 12:07:22 think that's it - anyone else has anything I forgot to mention? or questions/comments 12:08:23 I have news on the nfp side 12:08:32 go ahead 12:08:52 The application for an account was submitted and they eventually got back to us yesterday to clarify some points. 12:09:16 We think they should now respond in 3 working days 12:09:57 In related news the OSUOSL people are now looking at our request for hosting 12:10:20 Lance will give me a 'gut feel' response next time I catch him on irc :) 12:11:09 I haven't had time to follow up on the KDE organisation yet 12:11:39 :nod: 12:12:29 I have been working with a couple of people who are now setting up OBS systems for use in their organisations 12:12:51 that's all from me on general news 12:13:15 alright, thank you - anyone else? 12:13:34 * Sage_ has nothing to add 12:13:42 #topic AOB 12:13:49 any other business from anyone to discuss? 12:14:03 #info Next meeting at (Friday!) 20th April 2012, 11:00 UTC (corrected to fit daylight savings better) 12:14:25 Who are the current AB representatives? 12:14:58 from Nemo, Jukka Eklund still, from Plasma Active supposedly Danny Bennett but he hasn't shown up 12:15:03 will request them to send someone else 12:15:35 *nod* - I know he's had some timezone issues but I do want PA to be well represented 12:16:08 And we did get apologies from Jukka for today FYI 12:16:29 i had managed to forget(!) the meeting too, due to me putting it on a thursday by accident 12:16:50 I assumed it was friday :) 12:17:07 :) 12:17:29 alright, anyone got anything else to contribute, questions about directions, etc? 12:18:00 We had that meeting about a Mer community OBS 12:18:16 which raises organisational issues for the Mer project 12:19:37 I would like Mer (via this AB and our governance) to manage both the Mer Core and the Mer Community Collaboration functions 12:20:38 i would like to read the community OBS meeting minutes more properly before being able to properly discuss it 12:20:53 When I talk to people like eV and others - is this something that we can agree on as a goal? 12:21:21 when speaking to kde we need to first ask what kind of approach they'd prefer as their organisation would act as umbrella as well 12:21:22 In the abstract sense then 12:21:31 so let's see how it ends up 12:21:41 agreed 12:22:01 so what I want to do is have "a position" that represents Mer 12:22:18 If it weren't for legal issues we'd simply do both 12:23:01 as it is we have another high level goal of "don't let Mer Core be subject to shutdown risks due to collaboration" 12:23:42 :nod: 12:23:45 yes 12:24:25 as i noted in a conversation, there might not be a problem in having OBS workers underneath Mer 'budget', as it's the frontend/backend OBS that does the actual publishing of sources and binaries 12:24:31 so that may simplify matters 12:24:58 yep - I'd want to establish a starting position of "Mer currently has 2 areas, Core and Collaboration - we want to manage both but minimise risk" 12:25:59 without being too anal ... can we quickly agree a topic for the next AB ? 12:26:32 ie Propose to the AB that Mer currently has 2 areas, Core and Collaboration - we want to manage both but minimise risk 12:26:52 makes sense, suggest it as topic on mailing list 12:26:58 ideally before i put agenda out :) 12:27:05 :/ 12:27:33 ok, I need to go away for like 10mins at least. But I guess the main things are already discussed. 12:27:47 I have nothing else 12:27:52 :nod: me neither 12:27:54 anyone? 12:28:26 lbt: 'put on mailing list' == so it has the 48 hour discussion period as noted at least, and i remember to put it on the agenda 12:28:38 yep, writing mail now 12:29:08 alright 12:29:12 thank you all for coming 12:29:44 #endmeeting