#sailfishos-meeting: Sailfish OS, open source, collaboration -- 21st Dec 2023
Meeting started by rainemak at 08:00:11 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Meeting information and agenda can be found
here: (rainemak,
08:00:11)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-irc-21st-december-2023/17546
(rainemak,
08:00:11)
- Brief introduction (5 min). Please prefix your name/handle with #info (rainemak, 08:00:13)
- Ville Nummela - sailor @ Jolla (ViGe,
08:01:00)
- Matti Viljanen - community (direc85[m],
08:01:09)
- Raine Mäkeläinen - sailor @ Jolla, chairperson
today (rainemak,
08:01:22)
- Otto Mäkelä, community (ExTechOp,
08:01:35)
- voidanix - lurking virtuoso (voidanix[m],
08:01:39)
- Ruben De Smet - community (rubdos[m],
08:02:54)
- David Llewellyn-Jones - community (flypig,
08:03:12)
- Pami Ketolainen - Sailor @ Jolla (Keto,
08:03:33)
- Status of VoLTE packages availability (10mins -- asked by voidanix) (rainemak, 08:05:46)
- <voidanix> another SFOS release is
supposedly behind the corner and many (rainemak,
08:06:01)
- <voidanix> carriers have been shutting
down their 3G/2G infrastructures (rainemak,
08:06:01)
- <voidanix> this year. What is blocking
Jolla from releasing the (currently (rainemak,
08:06:01)
- <voidanix> proprietary) VoLTE packages to
public repositories, similarly (rainemak,
08:06:01)
- <voidanix> to how
sailfish-fpd/sailfish-fpd-slave-binder are available, (rainemak,
08:06:01)
- <voidanix> for the next release? Even if
possibly incompatible with other (rainemak,
08:06:02)
- <voidanix> devices, they would be of
great use with ports whose (rainemak,
08:06:04)
- <voidanix> architecture is close to the
ones of the SFOS X supported (rainemak,
08:06:06)
- <voidanix> devices (Qualcomm in
general). (rainemak,
08:06:10)
- <Jolla> Guess you’re referring to public
OBS repositories. In theory that (rainemak,
08:06:37)
- <Jolla> should be doable. Difference to
sailfish-fpd / (rainemak,
08:06:37)
- <Jolla> sailfish-fpd-slave-binder is that
those are based on binder (rainemak,
08:06:37)
- <Jolla> interface whereas VoLTE is not
based on similar common interface. (rainemak,
08:06:37)
- <Jolla> Rather being hardware specific.
So logically VoLTE belongs to (rainemak,
08:06:38)
- <Jolla> adaptation repository. That said,
let’s see what we could do. (rainemak,
08:06:40)
- <Jolla> This was added to our internal
issue tracker as well. (rainemak,
08:06:42)
- Peter G., late community lurker (nephros,
08:10:23)
- <<voidanix> Thank you for the update;
i raised this because we recently got a FOSS volte implementation on
android (rainemak,
08:11:02)
- <voidanix> you can find the code at
https://github.com/phhusson/ims (rainemak,
08:11:21)
- https://github.com/phhusson/ims
(rainemak,
08:11:30)
- <voidanix> The first volte calls on
samsung w/ custom ROM were done very recently with FOSS volte
implementation on Android (rainemak,
08:14:07)
- Status of OpenSSL (5mins -- asked by voidanix) (rainemak, 08:16:21)
- <voidanix> OpenSSL 1.1.1 has reached EOL
in September this year. Is Jolla (rainemak,
08:16:27)
- <voidanix> already working internally on
an upgrade to the latest 3.1 (or (rainemak,
08:16:28)
- <voidanix> even better, 3.2) version? If
not, should we expect it for the (rainemak,
08:16:28)
- <voidanix> release following the next
one? (rainemak,
08:16:28)
- <Jolla> Yes, we’re preparing &
working on OpenSSL 3.1 upgrade, and target (rainemak,
08:16:39)
- <Jolla> is to get it for the next
release. We have done a great amount of (rainemak,
08:16:39)
- <Jolla> package updates due to various
reasons. With the updated packages (rainemak,
08:16:39)
- <Jolla> hopefully, we are not hitting too
many builds errors when removing (rainemak,
08:16:39)
- <Jolla> deprecated OpenSSL 1.0 functions.
Fixing this is a requirement to (rainemak,
08:16:39)
- <Jolla> go to 3.1. If we miss the next
release, then target would be the (rainemak,
08:16:40)
- <Jolla> release after next. (rainemak,
08:16:42)
- cross-packages (10mins -- asked by rubdos and direc85) (rainemak, 08:23:03)
- <rubdos> Since 2022-12-14, several
packages (including rust and cargo) have (rainemak,
08:23:14)
- <rubdos> build dependencies on
cross-{armv7hl,aarch64}-{gcc,binutils,as,glibc} (rainemak,
08:23:14)
- <rubdos> and some more. I assume some
refactoring has been done in the (rainemak,
08:23:14)
- <rubdos> packaging, since before that
time, we could build rust etc. (rainemak,
08:23:14)
- <rubdos> ourselves on the Platform SDK.
These packages are nowhere to be (rainemak,
08:23:14)
- <rubdos> found, nor can we find a way to
build them ourselves, currently. (rainemak,
08:23:16)
- <rubdos> This makes it difficult to
contribute patches to Rust (and gcc (rainemak,
08:23:17)
- <rubdos> and gecko, cc flypig),
especially in terms of testing the (rainemak,
08:23:19)
- <rubdos> resulting compiler. (rainemak,
08:23:21)
- <rubdos> (rainemak,
08:23:23)
- <rubdos> Would it be possible for Jolla
to provide us with some insight, (rainemak,
08:23:25)
- <rubdos> sources and/or binaries for
these missing dependencies? We have (rainemak,
08:23:27)
- <rubdos> asked mal on IRC a few times, to
which the understandable answer (rainemak,
08:23:29)
- <rubdos> was that he could test the build
on OBS. This is however not a (rainemak,
08:23:31)
- <rubdos> sustainable process, especially
since we currently don’t get our (rainemak,
08:23:33)
- <rubdos> hands on the resulting 1.72
compiler. (rainemak,
08:23:35)
- <rubdos> (rainemak,
08:23:39)
- <rubdos> rainemak already said in the
previous meeting to have a look at (rainemak,
08:23:41)
- <rubdos> this, but I’d like to formalize
the request here. Thank you! (rainemak,
08:23:43)
- <Jolla> Short answer, yes it is possible
that we provide insight. Whilst we (rainemak,
08:23:51)
- <Jolla> were looking into this we noticed
that testing the OBS build was (rainemak,
08:23:51)
- <Jolla> ok. As answer ended up being too
long to irc meeting, we posted it (rainemak,
08:23:51)
- <Jolla> to the forum already. That should
be a good baseline to continue (rainemak,
08:23:52)
- <Jolla> the discussion. (rainemak,
08:23:53)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-irc-21st-december-2023/17546/11
(rainemak,
08:23:55)
- <Jolla> (rainemak,
08:23:57)
- <Jolla> Due to this question, we should
create an article to the (rainemak,
08:23:59)
- <Jolla> docs.sailfishos.org out of this
explanation. Please do not hesitate (rainemak,
08:24:01)
- <Jolla> to reach for example rainemak in
some channel if you’re still (rainemak,
08:24:03)
- <Jolla> facing issues. (rainemak,
08:24:05)
- ACTION: <Jolla>
Create an article to the docs.sailfishos.org regarding this
topic (rainemak,
08:30:31)
- What are the plans to enable 5G connectivity? (5mins -- asked by TNZ & cquence) (rainemak, 08:31:46)
- <cquence> I remember some work taking
place a while ago. Any update you (rainemak,
08:32:00)
- <cquence> can share would be great! P.S.
Well done on the restructuring (rainemak,
08:32:00)
- <cquence> and fair winds ahead! I
probably won’t be able to attend due to (rainemak,
08:32:00)
- <cquence> work commitments but will read
the logs afterwards. (rainemak,
08:32:00)
- <Jolla> There are 3-5 major stories which
we’d still like to sort out for (rainemak,
08:32:08)
- <Jolla> the next release and 5G is one of
them. So far 5G works on (rainemak,
08:32:08)
- <Jolla> Sailfish OS side but AppSupport
plugin is not yet finalized. Half (rainemak,
08:32:08)
- <Jolla> cooked version is bad as that
would break mobile data with (rainemak,
08:32:09)
- <Jolla> AppSupport. If we miss the next
release, then target would be the (rainemak,
08:32:11)
- <Jolla> release after next. (rainemak,
08:32:13)
- https://github.com/mer-hybris/ofono-binder-plugin/pull/28
(rainemak,
08:35:56)
- Open PR discussion (10 mins -- asked by Jolla) (rainemak, 08:38:52)
- <Jolla> Any open PRs to discuss?
(rainemak,
08:38:52)
- <topic> Bug reports by the community bug
coordination team (5 min -- asked by Jolla) (rainemak,
08:42:03)
- <Jolla> No bug reports for this community
meeting. Merry Christmas for the (rainemak,
08:42:03)
- <Jolla> whole Community Bug Coordination
Team and happy new year! You have (rainemak,
08:42:03)
- <Jolla> done fantastic job the
year! (rainemak,
08:42:03)
- <topic> Bug reports by the community bug
coordination team (5 min -- asked by Jolla) (rainemak,
08:42:22)
- Bug reports by the community bug coordination team (5 min -- asked by Jolla) (rainemak, 08:43:24)
- <Jolla> No bug reports for this community
meeting. Merry Christmas for the (rainemak,
08:43:43)
- <Jolla> whole Community Bug Coordination
Team and happy new year! You have (rainemak,
08:43:43)
- <Jolla> done fantastic job the
year! (rainemak,
08:43:43)
- General discussion (10 min) (rainemak, 08:44:27)
- Some 5G related PRs (rainemak,
08:44:53)
- https://github.com/sailfishos/ofono/pull/40
(rainemak,
08:44:54)
- https://github.com/mer-hybris/ofono-binder-plugin/pull/28
(rainemak,
08:44:54)
- https://github.com/sailfishos/libqofonoext/pull/3
(rainemak,
08:44:54)
- https://github.com/sailfishos/libgofono/pull/2
(rainemak,
08:44:54)
- <Jolla> If you’re interested in testing
CLAT with latest changes, please (rainemak,
08:46:54)
- <Jolla> read from here
https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/testing-clat-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks/14520/175
(rainemak,
08:46:54)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/testing-clat-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks/14520/175
(rainemak,
08:46:54)
- <Jolla> The release will occur when it's
ready ;) (rainemak,
08:47:29)
- <Jolla> We wish you all Merry Christmas
and Happy new year! This is the last community meeting of this
year. (rainemak,
08:50:23)
- Next meeting time and date (5 mins) (rainemak, 08:56:07)
- Next meeting will be held on Thursday 11th
January 2023 at 08:00am UTC: 2024-01-11T0800Z (rainemak,
09:00:24)
Meeting ended at 09:03:16 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- <Jolla> Create an article to the docs.sailfishos.org regarding this topic
People present (lines said)
- rainemak (168)
- flypig (21)
- direc85[m] (18)
- rubdos[m] (15)
- voidanix[m] (13)
- ExTechOp (9)
- ViGe (6)
- sailbot_ (2)
- Keto (2)
- nephros (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.