#sailfishos-meeting: Sailfish OS, open source, collaboration -- 7th May 2026
Meeting started by rainemak at 16:00:01 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Meeting information and agenda can be found
here: (rainemak,
16:00:01)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/29253
(rainemak,
16:00:01)
- Brief introduction (5 min). Please prefix your name/handle with #info (rainemak, 16:00:01)
- Raine Mäkeläinen, Jolla (rainemak,
16:00:10)
- Otto Mäkelä, community (extechop[m],
16:00:23)
- Anton Thomasson, community (attah,
16:00:33)
- polatbirdal (Polatbirdal,
16:01:06)
- Pami Ketolainen, Jolla (Keto,
16:01:19)
- ngt, community (Ngt,
16:01:39)
- roundedrectangle, community (roundedrectangle[m],
16:02:03)
- Andrew Branson, Jolla (abr,
16:02:15)
- mal, Jolla (mal,
16:03:12)
- Matti Viljanen, Jolla (direc85[m],
16:04:03)
- mettska community (mettska,
16:05:12)
- Tracking of non-resolved Community Meeting topics (rainemak, 16:05:25)
- ACTION: Community
task board (rainemak,
16:05:25)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/community-meeting-on-23rd-april-2026/29030/3
(rainemak,
16:05:25)
- No actions taken yet regarding community task
board. (rainemak,
16:05:25)
- nephros, community (nephros,
16:07:49)
- cable/charger requirements (10 mins -- ngt) (rainemak, 16:11:22)
- <ngt> Jolla mentioned in an earlier
community meeting that there will (rainemak,
16:11:22)
- <ngt> likely be no charger and cable in
the box (to reduce eWaste). For (rainemak,
16:11:22)
- <ngt> the few people that weren’t using a
smartphone with USB-C before, (rainemak,
16:11:22)
- <ngt> are there any recommendations (or
requirements) we should look for (rainemak,
16:11:22)
- <ngt> when buying a new charger and/or
cable? And at which point would you (rainemak,
16:11:24)
- <ngt> recommend getting a new
cable/charger? (rainemak,
16:11:25)
- <ngt> (rainemak,
16:11:27)
- <ngt> EDIT: Since posting the original
question I started thinking about (rainemak,
16:11:29)
- <ngt> not buying a new cable/charger
since I found a charging-only (rainemak,
16:11:31)
- <ngt> USB-C-to-A cable that I could reuse
with one of my old chargers or (rainemak,
16:11:33)
- <ngt> my laptop. (rainemak,
16:11:35)
- <ngt> - Do we need a cable that supports
data-transfers during setup (like (rainemak,
16:11:37)
- <ngt> on Android/iOS) or does it work
wirelessly or is this (rainemak,
16:11:41)
- <ngt> unsupported/only supported with
newer Android/iOS devices (in (rainemak,
16:11:43)
- <ngt> which case that might not
matter)? (rainemak,
16:11:45)
- <ngt> - Did you test charging speeds
using a USB(-A) port (If I recall (rainemak,
16:11:47)
- <ngt> correctly they are
standardized)? (rainemak,
16:11:49)
- <Jolla> Power delivery (PD) 3.0 charges
are good. We'll come back with recommendations later. Two follow up
questios, you do not need cable for datas-transfers during the
setup. We'll update on the charging speeds as well later along with
charger recommendations. (rainemak,
16:11:51)
- ACTION: Jolla to
update regarding recommended charging cables and chargers.
(rainemak,
16:12:43)
- Bug bounty program for Jolla (15 mins -- roundedrectangle) (rainemak, 16:20:02)
- <roundedrectangle> Does Jolla have
something like a bug bounty program? If (rainemak,
16:20:03)
- <roundedrectangle> someone would find and
provide to Jolla a serious (rainemak,
16:20:03)
- <roundedrectangle> security flaw which
would allow the attacker to access (rainemak,
16:20:03)
- <roundedrectangle> user’s private data,
view confidential information (rainemak,
16:20:03)
- <roundedrectangle> related to copyrighted
Jolla materials which should not (rainemak,
16:20:04)
- <roundedrectangle> be publicly available,
and/or affect the usability of (rainemak,
16:20:05)
- <roundedrectangle> the Jolla services
(take them down for a serious amount (rainemak,
16:20:07)
- <roundedrectangle> of time (crash), or
limit their functionality), would (rainemak,
16:20:11)
- <roundedrectangle> they get rewarded for
that? Where should one contact (rainemak,
16:20:13)
- <roundedrectangle> Jolla for reporting
the vulnerability, regardless of (rainemak,
16:20:15)
- <roundedrectangle> the answer to previous
question? (rainemak,
16:20:17)
- <Jolla> We do not have a bug bounty
program. Interesting idea though. (rainemak,
16:20:19)
- <Jolla> You can report vulnerability by
emailing to security@jolla.com. (rainemak,
16:20:21)
- CLMA31, community (CLMA31[m],
16:28:47)
- Including the package “usb-moded-connection-sharing-android-connman-config“ by default (5 mins -- Sanginteret) (rainemak, 16:30:07)
- <Sanginteret> I recently reinstalled my
Sailfish OS phone and spent about (rainemak,
16:30:07)
- <Sanginteret> an hour trying to figure
out why USB tethering was missing. (rainemak,
16:30:07)
- <Sanginteret> After several restarts and
cable changes, I checked the wiki (rainemak,
16:30:07)
- <Sanginteret> and found that I needed to
install a package. This feature (rainemak,
16:30:08)
- <Sanginteret> is present by default on
other smartphones. Maybe it should (rainemak,
16:30:12)
- <Sanginteret> also be enabled by default
on Sailfish OS. (rainemak,
16:30:14)
- <Jolla> Thank you for raising this
one. (rainemak,
16:30:16)
- <Jolla> It's still hacky. So, like it is
now it won't be added to images (rainemak,
16:30:18)
- <Jolla> by default. (rainemak,
16:30:20)
- Move to European code repository (5 mins -- Fuzzillogic) (rainemak, 16:36:22)
- <Fuzzillogic> Jolla presents Sailfish OS
as “the only European mobile OS”, (rainemak,
16:36:22)
- <Fuzzillogic> which powers “the
independent European Do It Together Linux (rainemak,
16:36:22)
- <Fuzzillogic> Phone”. (rainemak,
16:36:23)
- <Fuzzillogic> Yet, all the public
development and developer information is (rainemak,
16:36:23)
- <Fuzzillogic> hosted on GitHub: Sailfish
OS · GitHub. (rainemak,
16:36:24)
- <Fuzzillogic> (rainemak,
16:36:25)
- <Fuzzillogic> In the previous community
meeting, there was a question (rainemak,
16:36:27)
- <Fuzzillogic> about a Community Task
Board, and rainemak suggested to host (rainemak,
16:36:29)
- <Fuzzillogic> this on GitHub as well:
#sailfishos-meeting log (rainemak,
16:36:31)
- <Fuzzillogic> (rainemak,
16:36:33)
- <Fuzzillogic> Claiming to be the European
alternative, while continuing (rainemak,
16:36:35)
- <Fuzzillogic> (and even doubling down on)
using non-European code (rainemak,
16:36:37)
- <Fuzzillogic> repository provider smells
like “EU-washing”. (rainemak,
16:36:41)
- <Fuzzillogic> (rainemak,
16:36:43)
- <Fuzzillogic> Does Jolla have plans to
move to a European-based code (rainemak,
16:36:45)
- <Fuzzillogic> reposity, or self-host
it? (rainemak,
16:36:47)
- <Fuzzillogic> (rainemak,
16:36:49)
- <Fuzzillogic> P.s. Earlier I opened a
post here with the question Move to (rainemak,
16:36:51)
- <Fuzzillogic> European code repository?.
Unfortunately no response there (rainemak,
16:36:53)
- <Fuzzillogic> from Jolla. (rainemak,
16:36:55)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/move-to-european-code-repository/27242
(rainemak,
16:36:57)
- <Jolla> Currently we do not have plans to
change our code repositories. (rainemak,
16:36:59)
- https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html
(Dante2,
16:42:45)
- About the post that Jolla shared on April 29th. (5 mins -- Polatbirdal) (rainemak, 16:45:07)
- <Polatbirdal> I wanted to ask about the
article in this image — in which (rainemak,
16:45:07)
- <Polatbirdal> direction is this solution
currently progressing? Will it be (rainemak,
16:45:07)
- <Polatbirdal> about entering other
marketplace areas? Or will it be more (rainemak,
16:45:07)
- <Polatbirdal> like reaching out to more
users and offering them the best (rainemak,
16:45:07)
- <Polatbirdal> alternatives? (rainemak,
16:45:08)
- https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/29253/7
(rainemak,
16:45:12)
- <Jolla> Thank you for asking. We'll
update when there is something to (rainemak,
16:45:14)
- <Jolla> update. (rainemak,
16:45:16)
- Special Edition Back Cover for batch 1-3 (15 mins -- ngt) (rainemak, 16:50:49)
- <ngt> What did you mean with “Back
Cover”? There seem to be different (rainemak,
16:50:50)
- <ngt> definitions. Based on the name and
the picture (a line drawing of (rainemak,
16:50:50)
- <ngt> a case or the Jolla Phone) that was
used next to it on the (rainemak,
16:50:50)
- <ngt> preorder page, I previously assumed
it meant a case covering the (rainemak,
16:50:50)
- <ngt> back (which is similar to how other
companies use the term). Some (rainemak,
16:50:50)
- <ngt> things I’ve read since, however,
sound more like an additional (rainemak,
16:50:52)
- <ngt> back side. This wouldn’t match with
Jolla wanting to reduce (rainemak,
16:50:54)
- <ngt> e-waste, which was mentioned in a
previous community meeting, and (rainemak,
16:50:56)
- <ngt> would be less “compatible” with the
selected phone color (i. e. it (rainemak,
16:50:58)
- <ngt> would replace the selected
color). (rainemak,
16:51:00)
- <Jolla> This looks like pretty much
covered in the Forum already. (rainemak,
16:51:03)
- <Jolla> Back cover product product page
starts like this: (rainemak,
16:51:04)
- <Jolla> "Remember those times that you
were able to change your phone (rainemak,
16:51:06)
- <Jolla> appearance with a simple snap-on
covers?" (rainemak,
16:51:08)
- https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-back-cover
(rainemak,
16:51:12)
- <Jolla> We call it back cover and yes
it's ToH as well. When talking about (rainemak,
16:51:18)
- <Jolla> ToH, one would easily expect some
functionality. Protective (rainemak,
16:51:18)
- <Jolla> covers / cases / sleeves are
different. (rainemak,
16:51:20)
- <Jolla> (rainemak,
16:51:32)
- <Jolla> When it comes to "Special Edition
Back Cover" for batches #1, #2 (rainemak,
16:51:32)
- <Jolla> and #3. It is a limited early
supporters special edition back (rainemak,
16:51:32)
- <Jolla> cover. The design is undisclosed
for time being. Something one (rainemak,
16:51:32)
- <Jolla> cannot buy and exclusive to
pre-order batches #1, #2 and #3. (rainemak,
16:51:32)
- https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-protective-cover
(Dante2,
16:54:27)
- Open Pull Requests (PRs) to discussion (5 mins -- asked by Jolla) (rainemak, 17:01:47)
- General discussion (10 mins or so) (rainemak, 17:10:04)
- Next meeting time and date (2 mins) (rainemak, 17:21:25)
- Next meeting will be held on Thursday 21st May
2026 at 04:00pm UTC: 2026-05-21T1600Z (rainemak,
17:22:49)
Meeting ended at 17:23:23 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Community task board
- Jolla to update regarding recommended charging cables and chargers.
People present (lines said)
- rainemak (217)
- attah (34)
- abr (33)
- Polatbirdal (14)
- nephros (12)
- Keto (11)
- roundedrectangle[m] (11)
- mal (11)
- Dante2 (8)
- piggz[m] (7)
- extechop[m] (6)
- ngt (6)
- direc85[m] (5)
- Touko (5)
- sailbot (2)
- Ngt (2)
- CLMA31[m] (2)
- mettska (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.