| *** WoC is now known as Guest3430 | 05:42 | |
| rinigus | piggz: morning! I guess we can add revision after accepting as well | 07:08 |
|---|---|---|
| piggz | rinigus: so, accept with webhook then delete? | 07:26 |
| rinigus | piggz: no, not with webhoks | 07:26 |
| rinigus | as far as I remember, lbt was telling that some webhooks stay active even after removal. or there was something which is out of our control regarding it | 07:27 |
| piggz | rinigus: ok ... i was ablt to contact dcaliste via forum, and he has now resubmitted and enabled notifications.... | 07:27 |
| rinigus | so, better not. | 07:27 |
| piggz | nephros is uncontactable atm though via that method | 07:27 |
| rinigus | note that I maybe distributing FUD regarding webhook - but better safe than sorry | 07:28 |
| rinigus | the other package got resubmitted without webhook - so there is some response | 07:28 |
| rinigus | piggz: ^ | 07:28 |
| piggz | gr8, a saw some emails, but havnt checked yet | 07:29 |
| rinigus | piggz: I wonder whether we should open some chum room to notify each other when we start checking packages. so far looks like we haven't had any clashes though... | 07:30 |
| piggz | rinigus: heh, that also ocurred to me, that we could be doing double work | 07:31 |
| piggz | thats maep-qt added, and dcaliste made maintaier | 07:32 |
| rinigus | youtube-dl is in as well. have to finish with promoting and meta editing still. | 07:33 |
| rinigus | as for parallel work, so far we avoided it. let's see when it happens :) | 07:34 |
| rinigus | piggz: ^ | 07:34 |
| piggz | rinigus: are you not leaving promoting to the dev? | 07:35 |
| rinigus | piggz: no, not on the first submission. there is no need as we check testing compilation anyway | 07:35 |
| piggz | ok | 07:36 |
| rinigus | piggz: so, it is us who promote on the first submission; later dev will update in testing directly | 07:36 |
| rinigus | and then submit for promotion | 07:36 |
| piggz | right, that wasnt clear to me | 07:36 |
| rinigus | piggz: just want to keep admin/bureaucracy requests to a minimum :) | 07:39 |
| rinigus | now I see that there are some packages not pushed to chum from testing. would you promote them when ready? | 07:39 |
| rinigus | piggz (or someone else who knows): any idea how to contact openrepos master? | 07:43 |
| piggz | rinigus: yeahm the ones i accepted, ill get right on it | 07:43 |
| piggz | rinigus: he's on the forum, so message there? | 07:44 |
| piggz | rinigus: houston, we have failure | 07:44 |
| piggz | old sfos verison | 07:44 |
| piggz | probably disable then | 07:44 |
| rinigus | I'd disable it. as was done for other packages | 07:45 |
| piggz | looking at the log, its a bit odd | 07:46 |
| piggz | do i want to delve into fixing it | 07:46 |
| piggz | no, thats a massive distraction, ill just let dcaliste know | 07:46 |
| rinigus | piggz: maybe contact dcaliste and notify regarding the issue. don't think we can start fixing those, too much time | 07:47 |
| piggz | exactly | 07:47 |
| piggz | rinigus: do we need to add 3.2 and 3.3? | 07:49 |
| piggz | i had a pro1 user still on 3.3, so, it does happen | 07:49 |
| rinigus | piggz: then we can add. its just gcc was switched on 3.4 an quite a few packages rely on newer gcc | 07:50 |
| piggz | yeah, but we have 3.1 | 07:50 |
| rinigus | we do. well, let's add and then go through failures and disable corresponding combos | 07:51 |
| piggz | rinigus: so, we make the dev maintainer in testing: what about in main? | 07:58 |
| rinigus | piggz: not in main - that goes via us. at least that was original idea. | 07:59 |
| piggz | ok | 07:59 |
| piggz | thats fine | 07:59 |
| piggz | rinigus: brolli fails in all targets | 08:01 |
| rinigus | piggz: nephros triggered new builds. so, dev would have to sort it out, probably working on it as we speak | 08:03 |
| rinigus | no problem, that's what "testing" is about :) . | 08:03 |
| rinigus | piggz: so, when ready, I guess we can promote brolli to chum | 08:05 |
| piggz | rinigus: 3.2 and 3.3 seem broken | 08:52 |
| piggz | lbt: ^ | 08:53 |
| piggz | https://build.merproject.org/project/show/sailfishos:chum:testing | 08:53 |
| rinigus | piggz: ilpianista just submitted from :testing to :chum the update - exactly as it is expected. easy to check and accept :) | 09:18 |
| rinigus | lbt: any chance for getting https support for OBS repositories. context: https://github.com/sailfishos-chum/main/issues/21 . cc: piggz | 10:12 |
| ilpianista | rinigus: ouch, I didn't check matrix lately :-) Thanks for accepting my projects! | 10:13 |
| rinigus | ilpianista: thank you for submitting your work! | 10:14 |
| ilpianista | I've a problem with Storeman/openrepos. I published the RPM built from OBS, but Storeman doesn't see the updates. If I uninstall the application, then I get a "No packages available". What I'm missing? | 10:14 |
| rinigus | ilpianista: is it RPM from Chum repos or from your home project? if from Chum, I wonder whether us setting `vendor: chum` disturbs openrepos... | 10:16 |
| ilpianista | it's from my home project, but I could try with chum as well | 10:16 |
| rinigus | Home project should be fine. Maybe dependency missing? | 10:19 |
| rinigus | Have you tried to add chum repos to your phone? Would it work then? | 10:19 |
| rinigus | Afk for some time... | 10:19 |
| ilpianista | pkcon install works fine... I'm not sure what's going on :-/ | 10:36 |
| rinigus | ilpianista: maybe it was just pkcon refresh missing | 10:56 |
| ilpianista | no, because even after I installed it manually, Storeman says that it isn't installed and that no package is available | 10:59 |
| rinigus | Then no idea... I used to publish packages from OBS without any issues at openrepos and jolla store. But haven't updated apps recently | 11:05 |
| piggz | rinigus: could it be the new vendor? | 11:22 |
| rinigus | Not if home project was used... Or does it setup new vendor as well? | 11:26 |
| rinigus | piggz ^ | 11:27 |
| rinigus | lbt: question regarding possible webhooks (for integration of chum with openrepos). is there a possibility at OBS level to add webhook called by OBS on package compilation? | 14:24 |
| ilpianista | talking about webhooks... I got it right that they only work when for tags? (and thus I cannot use them for continuous integration) | 14:26 |
| ilpianista | d/when/ | 14:27 |
| rinigus | ilpianista: I actually don't know. as they have been bit moody, I prefer not to use them | 14:28 |
| ilpianista | it's fine... I could use gitlab for CI while OBS for the release builds | 14:28 |
| piggz | rinigus: "osc -A https://api.merproject.org api /service" doesnt indicate there are any unknown services we could use to do a notify | 17:26 |
| rinigus | piggz: we could even run small script pulling obs repos once in a while (15-30 mins) and checking if rpms have been updated. if they are, calling openrepos webhook. it would still do the job and provide integration... or maybe such script can run on OBS node | 17:29 |
| rinigus | with lbt blessing | 17:29 |
| rinigus | or maybe we can check if such service exists at suse obs? | 17:31 |
| rinigus | piggz: ^ | 17:31 |
| piggz | rinigus: maybe ... services are just scripts which live in a particular dir | 17:31 |
| rinigus | piggz: nothing similar in suse obs either | 17:33 |
| piggz | rinigus: lbt: looks like something like it is avialable but likely on a version above ours, and beta https://openbuildservice.org/2021/05/31/scm-integration/ | 18:13 |
| piggz | in this case, the build notification goes back to where the webhook ocurred, so a little different | 18:14 |
| mike7b4[m] | Hi! Last week I bought a new SFOS phone Xperai 10 II. and now trying to get Rust working in the build environment. But I tried several things without success. First of it seems the "official" has an outdated. Rust. So I tried the | 18:48 |
| attah | mike7b4[m]: how old are we talking? Looks like the version in the repos now (probably for next release) is 1.52.1 | 18:52 |
| mike7b4[m] | Hi! Last week I bought a new SFOS phone Xperia 10 II. and now trying to get Rust working in the build environment. But I tried several things without success. First of it seems the "official" has an outdated Rust. So I tried the @coderus docker image but I still can figure out how to install Rust. I tried create an Rust from the: https://github.com/sailfishos/rust.git mb2 created the RPMS. But now I am stuck how to install it in the | 18:53 |
| mike7b4[m] | target sysroot. I tried | 18:53 |
| mike7b4[m] | ```sb2 sb2 -t SailfishOS-latest-aarch64 zypper -p . install cargo # but this failed cause zypper needs root. But when run sb2 as root it seems sb2 does not find the target.``` | 18:53 |
| mike7b4[m] | attah: I dont remember (This was in the official SDK) I think it was 1.44 or something and many crates fasiled to build cauise of that. | 18:54 |
| attah | looks like that was the previous version indeed | 18:54 |
| attah | so either wait a bit, or figure out how to build and install this https://github.com/sailfishos/rust | 18:56 |
| attah | ...and that's probably all the useful things i can add unfortunately | 18:57 |
| mike7b4[m] | yes thats the one I try now but cant figure out how to install in the toolchain. | 18:57 |
| mike7b4[m] | RPMS are created but cant find anything in the wiki how to install RPMS in the sysroot via sb2. | 18:58 |
| Nico | I suggest asking the whisperfish dev, they did the same thing I think | 18:59 |
| Nico | Ruben De Smet, I think? | 18:59 |
| attah | i.e. rubdos[m] | 19:00 |
| attah | pings away! | 19:00 |
| mike7b4[m] | ok | 19:01 |
| mike7b4[m] | thanks | 19:01 |
| rinigus | piggz, lbt: thinking of it, our notification should go only after the repo has been published. so, if we have something else building, we cannot call webhook yet. so, webhook should be on repo level or on publishing event, if it exists | 19:15 |
| mike7b4[m] | https://odysee.com/@rossmanngroup:a/for-every-freedom-we've-lost-we've:4 /facepalm | 19:41 |
| rubdos[m] | <attah> "i.e. Ruben De Smet..." <- Ping me on #whisperfish:rubdos.be , or here tomorrow morning, or by mail, Ill try to help tomorrow | 20:00 |
| rubdos[m] | mike7b4 , that is | 20:00 |
| attah | (: | 20:01 |
| mike7b4[m] | rubdos[m]: yup | 20:04 |
| mal | mike7b4[m]: to run commands as root with sb2 you use sb2 -t some_target -R some_command | 22:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!